The main problem we're seeing is false positives on SPAMHEADERS, BADHEADERS...
Just a reminder here --
Although the SPAMHEADERS test will have quite a few false positives (mainly
from poorly designed websites, but the false positives go down a lot by
using the new LOOSENSPAMHEADERS ON
damn your good!
I just added a list of new domains and addresses to block from a posting on this list.
I found it deep in the middle a domain was
being blocked mail.com I added a @ so it now reads @mail.com
Works fine now. Let this be a lesson to us all. Use the block lists at your own risks!
Here are a couple of emails we received that were flagged with BADHEADERs
but are valid subscriptions...anything appear out of order?
Received: from mail.yourdictionary.com [206.14.214.45] by vwc.net with ESMTP
(SMTPD32-6.06) id
Interesting...thanks, Scott.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Is there a feature list for the JunkMail
beta? Fw: [Declude.JunkMail] New filter test
Here are a
