Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: DNS Issue (HELP)

2003-12-20 Thread R. Scott Perry
Check this out 1.) Do a direct query against ns1.loudcloud.com for wltx.com - Returns 66.54.32.202. 2.) Do a direct query against ns1.infi.net for wltx.com - Returns 66.54.32.202. 3.) Do a direct query against ns1.mindspring.net or ns2. or ns3 and the query will in general 9 out of 10 times

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: DNS Issue (HELP)

2003-12-20 Thread Darrell LaRock
Matt, I think you are right. My guess is that for some reason they dropped the domain out of the root servers for a period of time and the major isps grabed the worldnic servers as being authoratative. Not much we can do, other than wait... Darrell -- Original Message

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: DNS Issue (HELP)

2003-12-19 Thread Omar K.
I was able to resolve wltx.com just fine. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell LaRock Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2003 3:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: DNS Issue (HELP) This is off topic, but I need some

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: DNS Issue (HELP)

2003-12-19 Thread Scott Winberg
Hello Darrell, Working from here. Denver, CO area. Scott Friday, December 19, 2003, 6:59:06 PM, you wrote: Darrell This is off topic, but I need some help in a bad way to figure out a DNS problem I am having that is preventing one of our sites from receiving mail and thier web site from

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: DNS Issue (HELP)

2003-12-19 Thread Scott Winberg
Hello Darrell, Email works too: 12:19 19:41 SMTP-(07540069) [x] Connecting socket to service SMTP on host wltx.com using protocol tcp 12:19 19:41 SMTP-(07540069) [x] using source IP for arvadafire.com [65.125.147.225] 12:19 19:41 SMTP-(07540069) Info - Found wltx.com in DNS Cache 12:19 19:41

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: DNS Issue (HELP)

2003-12-19 Thread Darrell LaRock
I am absolutly baffled. Eathlink Dial-up - Does not work Charter Cable Connection - Does not work ATT T1 using local bind server - Works Roadrunner Cable - Does not work AOL - Intermittent. Several users who replied - Works Darrell -- Original Message --

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: DNS Issue (HELP)

2003-12-19 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
I'd say that the domain is fine at its new home; the question is what was the TTL on the domain before it was moved? I would go very little out on a limb and say that the folks with trouble to wltx.com were cacheing the DNS for longer than the TTL on the domain, or it was really high before the

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: DNS Issue (HELP)

2003-12-19 Thread Darrell LaRock
Andrew, One question that I have is the TTL stuff shouldnt matter since the zone files that were moved over are the same. All we are doing is switching DNS providers right now. Darrell -- Original Message -- From: Colbeck, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: DNS Issue (HELP)

2003-12-19 Thread Doug Anderson
Service and Clear DNS Cache...just a thought. - Original Message - From: Darrell LaRock [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 8:46 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: DNS Issue (HELP) I am absolutly baffled. Eathlink Dial-up - Does not work

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: DNS Issue (HELP)

2003-12-19 Thread Darrell LaRock
Scott, We duplicated the zone files between both providers. So all records are identical. If the zone files are the same than all of the timeouts should not matter. Check this out 1.) Do a direct query against ns1.loudcloud.com for wltx.com - Returns 66.54.32.202. 2.) Do a direct query

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: DNS Issue (HELP)

2003-12-19 Thread Darrell LaRock
Scott, On the DNSSTUFF, I used the cached ISP report looking at the NS record. What does it mean when an ISP has the name server set to ns92.worldnic.com? Does this mean at one time when the domain was looked up it was not resolved from the root servers? ATT Worldnet #1

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: DNS Issue (HELP)

2003-12-19 Thread Matthew Bramble
Darrell, It looks like your name server records were maybe munged for a period of time from a root update that is now fixed. Those munged records though are being cached and they should get a good copy once they expire. This might explain why all of us seem to be able to resolve your domain,