up
> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 11:48 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Regarding Obfuscation
>
>
> Well, Declude certainly works as it caught this message. :-)
>
> Erik
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PR
|On the first step it checks the entire body in ist raw format.
|Before the second step any html-tags (real or invented) are removed.
|
|This allows to identify a lot of obfusticated keywords.
|
|I assume other external content-tests like Spammanager and
|Sortmonster are also able to do this. You
Well, Declude certainly works as it caught this message. :-)
Erik
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rob Salmond
> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 08:54
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Regarding Obfuscation
>
There was some talk a while ago about blocking the tags used to make it
difficult to parse text in spam.
That depends:
this stuff:
ou thousands over the life of your
loan! What are you
waiting for? http://mtggreat1.com/4/index.asp?RefID=588897";>
Visit Now
This is easy to catch. In the latest
Hi Rob,
If you want you can try SpamChk. At his current release it has two
levels of keyword checks.
On the first step it checks the entire body in ist raw format.
Before the second step any html-tags (real or invented) are removed.
This allows to identify a lot of obfusticated keywords.
I a
