Thanks, Sharyn
-d
- Original Message -
From: "Sharyn Schmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 7:38 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF Issues
If nothing else, we catch a good bit of spam and viruses that forge our
em
If nothing else, we catch a good bit of spam and viruses that forge our
email addresses by using SPF.
I have found, that so, far, the BEST usage for SPF, as stated above, is that
it's catching spam that has spoofed my own domain's address.
Sharyn
We are the worldwide producer and marketer of t
Thanks to Darin and Sandy.
-d
- Original Message -
From: "Darin Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 4:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF Issues
> I believe the consensus has been that SPF Pass is not good to us
I believe the consensus has been that SPF Pass is not good to use in
negative weighting, but SPF Fail helps. If nothing else, we catch a good
bit of spam and viruses that forge our email addresses by using SPF. As it
gets more widely adopted, it will help more. There is still the drawback
for we
> Has anybody else done this? What are you all seeing with SPF?
Most don't score SPFPASS. Suggest you follow suit and only work with
failures.
--Sandy
Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
Broadleaf Systems, a division of
Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc.
e-
