--- Original Message -
From: "Bill Landry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 2:03 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamhaus
FYI, from Steve Linford of spamhaus:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/news.admin.net-abuse.email/msg/2d050ab220faf931
http:
Good to know. Thanks, Bill.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Landry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 2:03 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamhaus
FYI, from Steve Linford of spamhaus:
http://groups-beta.google.com/grou
FYI, from Steve Linford of spamhaus:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/news.admin.net-abuse.email/msg/2d050ab220faf931
http://www.spamhaus.org/zen/
Bill
David Sullivan wrote the following on 11/15/2006 12:58 PM -0800:
> Does anyone have the proper setup in Declude to query
> sbl-xbl.spamhaus.
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamhaus
I just read that, too.
I've commented out my NJABLPROXIES ip4r test in my global.cfg
and noted that this is duplicated in my XBL test.
-
*From:* Nick Hayer <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*To:* declude.junkmail@declude.com <mailto:declude.junkmail@declude.com>
*Sent:* Wednesday, November 15, 2006 7:44 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamhaus
nothing - Matt with his trickery is adding more weight to a last hop
that
esday, November 15, 2006 5:06 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamhaus
FYI... from http://www.spamhaus.org/xbl/index.lasso
"Mail servers already using dnsbl.njabl.org are advised to
continue doing so, as dnsbl.njabl.org
t complete, overlap between XBL and NJABL.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Matt
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 7:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamhaus
You are correct. I clearly missed the change where they removed BLITZEDALL
from di
: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamhaus
Darin,
You were using different addresses for the lookups. It works the same except
that two requests are sent instead of one. If you combine the SBL, CBL(XBL)
and NJABL lookups to use the same sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org domain, it will only
need to do one lookup
esday, November 15, 2006 7:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamhaus
nothing - Matt with his trickery is adding more weight to a last hop that fails
the test...
-Nick
Darin Cox wrote:
Then what was wrong with my example?
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Matt
To: d
om>
*Sent:* Wednesday, November 15, 2006 7:19 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamhaus
Andy,
What you posted will work exactly the same way and there is no
advantage either way except that your example is more normalized. I
use the variables for a purpose that isn't necessary
.junkmail@declude.com>
*Sent:* Wednesday, November 15, 2006 7:19 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamhaus
Andy,
What you posted will work exactly the same way and there is no
advantage either way except that your example is more normalized. I
use the variables for a purpose that isn
t" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamhaus
This is how to do it properly. Declude will do the lookup once when
configured like this.
SPAMHAUSdnsbl%IP4R%.sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org127.0.0.2
12
Then what was wrong with my example?
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Matt
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 7:19 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamhaus
Andy,
What you posted will work exactly the same way and there is no advantage either
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 05:35 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamhaus
This is how to do i
>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamhaus
This is how to do it properly. Declude will do the lookup once when
configured like this.
SPAMHAUSdnsbl%IP4R%.sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org127.0.0.2
120
XBLdnsbl%
t: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamhaus
This is how to do it properly. Declude will do the lookup once when
configured like this.
SPAMHAUS dnsbl%IP4R%.sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org 127.0.0.2 120
XBLdnsbl%IP4R%.sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org 127.0.0.460
BLITZEDALL dnsbl%IP4R
This is how to do it properly. Declude will do the lookup once when
configured like this.
SPAMHAUSdnsbl%IP4R%.sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org127.0.0.2
120
XBLdnsbl%IP4R%.sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org127.0.0.460
BLITZEDALL dnsbl%IP4R%.sbl-xbl.spamhaus.o
Global.cfg
-
SBL ip4rsbl.spamhaus.org * 55 0
XBL ip4rxbl.spamhaus.org * 55 0
or , for combined results,
SBL-XBL ip4rsbl-xbl.spamhaus.org * 55 0
$default$.junkmail
---
SBL WARN
XBLWARN
or , for combined re
Yes. They are making a good point. The courts shouldn't allow spammers
to file SLAPP suits as a way to threaten blacklists out of the
business. Even though Spamhaus could have fought this and won quite
easily, the fact that one has to spend resources fighting SLAPP suits is
a threat in itsel
Of John Carter
Sent: Wednesday,
December 01, 2004
12:32 PM
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE:
[Declude.JunkMail]
Spamhaus
Please
explain. BLITZED-ALL and CBL
don’t check Spamhaus, do they? Scott’s spam database page
makes it look like BLITZED-ALL goes to opm.blitzed.org
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Carter
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004
12:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
Spamhaus
Please explain. BLITZED-ALL and CBL
don’t check Spamhaus, do they? Scott’s spam database page
makes it look like
the SBL-XBL
hit score?
Thanks,
John
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004
12:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
Spamhaus
No, that zone is only for SBL entries. There is a combined zone
From:
Matt
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 5:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamhaus
It is the same as CBL, so be careful not to include both. XBL/CBL is
very accurate, primarily targets spam zombies, and should hit on about
40% of you
0
Is this the correct way to combine the
tests?
Thanks,
John
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bennie
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004
5:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
Spamhaus
is this the s
is this the same as the following
SBL ip4r sbl.spamhaus.org
Bennie
- Original Message -
From: Matt
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 5:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamhaus
It is the same as CBL, so be careful not to include both.
XBL/CBL
It is the same as CBL, so be careful not to include both. XBL/CBL is
very accurate, primarily targets spam zombies, and should hit on about
40% of your spam.
Matt
Doug Anderson wrote:
Anyone use the xbl db from spamhaus? Good, bad,
otherwise?
--
=
On Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 3:11:42 PM, Doug wrote:
DA> Anyone use the xbl db from spamhaus? Good, bad, otherwise?
Good.
_M
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe,
Yes, it nails alot of spam
Rick DavidsonNational Systems ManagerNorth American Title
Group-
- Original Message -
From:
Doug Anderson
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 3:11
PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail]
Spamhaus
Anyone use the xbl db f
28 matches
Mail list logo
