RE: [Declude.JunkMail] The first time BONDEDSENDER didn't work for me me

2003-12-06 Thread George Kulman
half Of > ISPHuset Nordic > Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2003 10:54 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] The first time BONDEDSENDER > didn't work for me me > > > Is it possibble to set an iprange in IFBYPASS ? > > So that all 128 ips

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] The first time BONDEDSENDER didn't work for me me

2003-12-06 Thread ISPHuset Nordic
EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] The first time BONDEDSENDER > didn't work for me me > > IPBYPASS is great except for the 20 entry limitation. ATT, > where many of my clients and myself have mailboxes that > forward to my IMail server has 23 mail forwarde

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] The first time BONDEDSENDER didn't work for me me

2003-12-06 Thread George Kulman
ltiple hop scanning"? > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Matthew Bramble > Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 11:34 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] The first time BONDEDSENDER &g

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] The first time BONDEDSENDER didn't work for me me

2003-12-05 Thread Matthew Bramble
Matthew Bramble Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 7:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] The first time BONDEDSENDER didn't work for me me George, The suggestion by Andrew to rename the test BONDEDSENDER-DYNA would definitely prevent it from scanning prior hops. I find

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] The first time BONDEDSENDER didn't work for me me

2003-12-05 Thread George Kulman
there were other ways to handle the valid mail. > > > >George > > > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > >>Robert Grosshandler > >>Sent: Friday, Dece

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] The first time BONDEDSENDER didn't work for me me

2003-12-05 Thread Matthew Bramble
OTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] The first time BONDEDSENDER didn't work for me me Negative weights on last hop only? How would that affect a gateway (or e-mail that goes to a backup mail server)? Rob --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] ---

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] The first time BONDEDSENDER didn't work for me me

2003-12-05 Thread George Kulman
e the valid mail. George > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Robert Grosshandler > Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 6:38 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] The first time BONDEDSENDE

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] The first time BONDEDSENDER didn't work for me me

2003-12-05 Thread Matthew Bramble
I meant negative weights on last hop for the RBL's. There are only a few popular ones out there. Gateways should be IPBYPASsed. Matt Robert Grosshandler wrote: Negative weights on last hop only? How would that affect a gateway (or e-mail that goes to a backup mail server)? Rob --- [T

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] The first time BONDEDSENDER didn't work for me me

2003-12-05 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Negative weights on last hop only? How would that affect a gateway (or e-mail that goes to a backup mail server)? Rob --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declu