RE: [Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT: COVAD VOIP

2005-12-13 Thread Dave Beckstrom
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Evans Martin Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 5:57 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT: COVAD VOIP I have been using Vonage at home and love it. I had tried Lingo before

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT: COVAD VOIP

2005-12-13 Thread Avolve Support
We've been using Nuvio since April of this year and have not looked back. Have not experience the problems that we encountered with Commpartners.us or Vonage, the quality has been much better than expected. Vonage didn't work well over our wireless network for unknown reasons except for the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT: COVAD VOIP

2005-12-13 Thread Dean Lawrence
@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT: COVAD VOIP I have been using Vonage at home and love it.I had tried Lingo before Vonage and HATED it, although I think most of the problems were due to the D-Link hardware that they supplied. I have had some experience with Linux based PBX

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT: COVAD VOIP

2005-12-13 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Check out www.onebox.com (virtual receptionist). Combine it with vonage. Rob -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 11:23 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT: COVAD VOIP

2005-12-13 Thread Avolve Support
] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Evans Martin Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 5:57 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT: COVAD VOIP I have been using Vonage at home and love it. I had tried Lingo before Vonage and HATED it, although I think

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT: COVAD VOIP

2005-12-13 Thread Dave Doherty
? Get a 703 number. They'll never know you're in MN. -d - Original Message - From: Dave Beckstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 12:22 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT: COVAD VOIP Hi Guys, I have a T-1 in my house and I

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT: COVAD VOIP

2005-12-13 Thread Dave Doherty
This sounds like just the ticket. What does it cost? -d - Original Message - From: Robert Grosshandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 12:36 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT: COVAD VOIP Check out www.onebox.com (virtual

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT: COVAD VOIP

2005-12-13 Thread Jeff
- From: Dave Beckstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 12:22 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT: COVAD VOIP Hi Guys, I have a T-1 in my house and I work from a home office in Minnesota. I have a sales person in New Mexico. Ideally

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT: COVAD VOIP

2005-12-13 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Not sure, but it is cheap. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Doherty Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 2:25 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT: COVAD VOIP This sounds like just the ticket. What

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT: COVAD VOIP

2005-12-13 Thread Dave Beckstrom
] On Behalf Of Robert Grosshandler Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 2:38 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT: COVAD VOIP Not sure, but it is cheap. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Doherty Sent

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT: COVAD VOIP

2005-12-12 Thread calvis
Yes this is Way OT :) The good thing about Covad VOIP is that they will provide you with a SLA which is rare for a VOIP provider. The Cons are: 1) You have to use their switch router brand of phones. 2) Rates are not really that good compared to other VOIP providers. 3) Their interface is

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT: COVAD VOIP

2005-12-12 Thread Dave Doherty
I use Vonage - $25/mo unlimited for home use. Been using it for about six months, and the only problem I encountered was an occasional breakup of the voice channel while downloading large files. I was using it on a Covad 384k DSL line, which I just dropped in favor of Verizon's Fios service.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT: COVAD VOIP

2005-12-12 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
I know for a bit vonage did not provide 911 service - has that been resolved yet by them? I know the FCC mandated it.. Darrell Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And Imail.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT: COVAD VOIP

2005-12-12 Thread Dave Doherty
about a lawsuit in Texas. -d - Original Message - From: Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 2:44 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT: COVAD VOIP I know for a bit vonage did not provide 911 service - has

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT: COVAD VOIP

2005-12-12 Thread Evans Martin
I have been using Vonage at home and love it. I had tried Lingo before Vonage and HATED it, although I think most of the problems were due to the D-Link hardware that they supplied. I have had some experience with Linux based PBX systems and have found them to be much more cost effective than

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT: COVAD VOIP

2005-12-12 Thread Erik Currier
I'll agree with Evans. We tried Lingo and Skype. Vonage is far better. I live in Prague, Czech Republic 9 months of the year... 3 months in USA. We use Vonage to connect to North America via phone. Vonage does have settings to control how much bandwith is used when on the phone and on the