RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Weight and Action Question

2004-04-21 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Yep, a configuration of WEIGHT10 DELETE and a WEIGHT20 HOLD would indeed
delete a message with a weight of 21.

Something you mentioned earlier prompts me to point out another thing; the
veterans in the list generally regard HOLD messages not as something they
have to check out several times a day to manually sort, but rather as a
convenient way to not bug the intended recipient while we are still able to
retrieve and deliver the mail for that recipient in case of a false
positive.

The net result is that we're more likely to err by holding a message than to
err by deleting it!

For reviewing messages, SpamReview is very popular; I stopped using it a
long time ago, though, due to the high volume I get (I delete very little).
Also, the \imail\spool\spam folder will of course grow in time, so you'll
want a handy utility that you can schedule to delete messages there that are
older than whatever time you choose.  See the Declude website, Tools page
for links to these and other tools.

Andrew 8)

-Original Message-
From: Goran Jovanovic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 8:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Weight and Action Question


 
 Think of it this way -- if you used the HOLD action for E-mail with a
 weight of 5 or higher, and the DELETE action for E-mail with a weight
of
 10
 or higher, which action would you want taken on an E-mail with a
weight of
 25?
 

In your description I would want the DELETE taken. 

I was thinking of the whole thing is a different light. Specific test
gets action taken first then aggregate tests like WEIGHT20 get taken in
highest to lowest weight order. Then other things...

To paraphrase you JunkMail looks through all the actions of all the
tests that have been tripped starting with the most severe (strict)
DELETE and working down the list.

So if you did it wrong and setup WEIGHT10 DELETE and WEIGHT20 HOLD then
all e-mail with a weight of 10 or higher would be deleted and none would
be held. Right? OK you would have to be mostly asleep to set it up this
way...

Goran

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Weight and Action Question

2004-04-21 Thread R. Scott Perry

To paraphrase you JunkMail looks through all the actions of all the
tests that have been tripped starting with the most severe (strict)
DELETE and working down the list.
That's another way of looking at it.  In this case, if there is a conflict 
with an action that has already been taken, the one that has already been 
taken will have priority.

So if you did it wrong and setup WEIGHT10 DELETE and WEIGHT20 HOLD then
all e-mail with a weight of 10 or higher would be deleted and none would
be held. Right? OK you would have to be mostly asleep to set it up this
way...
Correct.

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers 
since 2000.
Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Weight and Action Question

2004-04-20 Thread R. Scott Perry

If you are trying out a new test and are not sure what it is going to do
you set the WEIGHT of that test to 0 and then monitor it. One way would
be to use a HOLD action on that test.
My question is if the WEIGHT was not set to 0 but say 10 and the action
is HOLD will the e-mail be held regardless of the total weight?
Not necessarily (since there may be tests with negative weights).  For 
example, by default, if an E-mail does not fail the 
NOLEGITCONTENT/IPNOTINMX tests, it will start with a weight below 
0.  Therefore, if an E-mail failed just the new test, the E-mail would not 
have a weight of 10 or higher.

If that is true then why does it matter what the weight is set to?
Because some people may, for example, use WEIGHT10 HOLD and WEIGHT20 
DELETE.  In this case, an E-mail that would have otherwise had a weight of 
12 (and therefore held) would now have a weight of 22 (and be deleted).  So 
in this case, the test would be live and running and doing its thing.

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers 
since 2000.
Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Weight and Action Question

2004-04-20 Thread Goran Jovanovic
 
 Well, you might also have a WHITELIST action, or a WEIGHT action for a
 high
 value that does a DELETE.
 

I guess what is important is to find out the precedence of the ACTION
keywords. So if a WEIGHT10 is set with a DELETE action and the test that
you are testing has a WEIGHT of 1 and the total score of the message is
25 then I would hope that regardless of the final weight the HOLD action
on a specific test would take precedence.

 
 Instead, I would recommend using a weight of 1.  A weight of zero,
even if
 the test is triggered and an action taken, will make the test NOT show
up
 in
 the list of tests triggered in your declude log file on the total
 weight=
 line (at LOGLEVEL MID, anyway).

This makes sense and is a good point

Thanx
Goran

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Weight and Action Question

2004-04-20 Thread R. Scott Perry

I guess what is important is to find out the precedence of the ACTION
keywords.
In the case of multiple actions, Declude JunkMail will try to use 
both.  But in combinations where they cannot logically be combined (such as 
HOLD and DELETE -- doing one means that you can't do the other), Declude 
JunkMail will use the stricter action (in the HOLD/DELETE case, DELETE is 
stricter).  The actions are listed in the manual in the order of precedence 
(the ones towards the bottom are the stricter ones).

So if a WEIGHT10 is set with a DELETE action and the test that
you are testing has a WEIGHT of 1 and the total score of the message is
25 then I would hope that regardless of the final weight the HOLD action
on a specific test would take precedence.
No.  If the total weight of the E-mail is 25, and you want to delete E-mail 
with a weight of 10 or higher, the E-mail will be deleted.

Think of it this way -- if you used the HOLD action for E-mail with a 
weight of 5 or higher, and the DELETE action for E-mail with a weight of 10 
or higher, which action would you want taken on an E-mail with a weight of 25?

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers 
since 2000.
Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Weight and Action Question

2004-04-20 Thread Goran Jovanovic
 
 Think of it this way -- if you used the HOLD action for E-mail with a
 weight of 5 or higher, and the DELETE action for E-mail with a weight
of
 10
 or higher, which action would you want taken on an E-mail with a
weight of
 25?
 

In your description I would want the DELETE taken. 

I was thinking of the whole thing is a different light. Specific test
gets action taken first then aggregate tests like WEIGHT20 get taken in
highest to lowest weight order. Then other things...

To paraphrase you JunkMail looks through all the actions of all the
tests that have been tripped starting with the most severe (strict)
DELETE and working down the list.

So if you did it wrong and setup WEIGHT10 DELETE and WEIGHT20 HOLD then
all e-mail with a weight of 10 or higher would be deleted and none would
be held. Right? OK you would have to be mostly asleep to set it up this
way...

Goran

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.