RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist strategy needed

2004-01-17 Thread Robert Grosshandler
I can't tell if they actually control that IP. If they did, I guess I could. -- -Would adding 66.207.130.10 into your host antispam trusted ip addresses work? ~Rick Due to the nature of our business (online retail), we get some e-mail that triggers most content driven spam

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist strategy needed

2004-01-17 Thread Rick Klinge
Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2004 11:17 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist strategy needed I can't tell if they actually control that IP. If they did, I guess I could. -- -Would adding 66.207.130.10 into your host antispam trusted ip

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist strategy needed

2004-01-17 Thread Pete McNeil
We (SortMonster) can easily create custom white rules for this specific message as part of our normal subscription policy. Please let us know if that's what you'd like to do. Another thing also is that you could code such a rule to an alternate symbol (such as 10 for example) and have Declude

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist strategy needed

2004-01-17 Thread Kevin Bilbee
Why not setup a filter and negative weight the helo string for beefree.com. Use enough negative weight to deliver the mail. Kevin Bilbee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Robert Grosshandler Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2004 7:22 AM To: