Hi Bill,
If the email contains only images and no text the images are linked to
external sources (http://www.domain.com/image.g_i_f ) SPAMCHK gives a
certain weight if there are external images.
We've tried to filter mails containing ONLY images (after removing all
HTML there should not remain
I haven't tried SPAMCHK yet, but I've heard you guys talking about it on the list.
Maybe I'll give it a try.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Markus Gufler
Sent: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 09:40:55 +0100
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spam w/ all images
Hi Bill,
If the email contains only
I have had good luck stopping a few spammers by looking at the image paths,
alot of these clowns serve their images from comprimised (or open by
default) servers. This is especially prevalent among the pornsters.
For example the same graphic based spam may have been sent from several
sources with
Rick,
Would you mind posting a copy of this file?
Thanks much!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rick Davidson
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 12:18
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] spam w/ all images
I have had good luck
How about adding a test for if the text/html segment of an email contains
all IMG tags, with no actual text? Seems like that sort of spam is
getting more prevelent lately.
We are looking at the possibility of (optionally) parsing HTML segments,
which might end up allowing for this somehow (by
