Re: [Declude.JunkMail]Log Question

2005-03-08 Thread Chuck Shaffer
Sounds like the problem is in 2.x I went from 1.79 to 2.05, where can I download 1.82, or can someone send it to me? Thanks Chuck - Original Message - From: Erik [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 12:16 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]Log

RE: [Declude.JunkMail]Log Question

2005-03-07 Thread Erik
There is an issue with 2.0+ and the DELETE action when there's a certain type of configuration used. Declude seems to be aware of it, but no official notice or known issues have been posted; other then from user's of DECLUDE. We've elected to revert back to 1.82 (with the subject fix) for the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Log Question

2004-03-25 Thread R. Scott Perry
Below is a line from my declude log file. I was able to get the message ID from my syslog and then went to my declude log file and found this. Could someone explain to me why this was caught? It was not caught: 03/25/2004 08:44:52 Qe2520a28017a22f2 Tests failed [weight=0]: IPNOTINMX=IGNORE

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Log question

2004-02-24 Thread R. Scott Perry
I've noticed the tests HOUR and IPNOTINMX are preceded by an n in mylogs, such as nHOUR and nIPNOTINMX. That means that the a weight was applied because an E-mail did *not* fail the test. HOURhour6 20 0 1 IPNOTINMX ipnotinmx x x

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Log Question

2003-02-07 Thread Tom
Has anyone else noticed bad log lines in the JM log? I will get a short spurt of partial log entries, usually without a newline to separate them, occasionally just the end of an entry on a line by itself. Never seems to last more than a minute. It can really mess with log analysis. Yes, I