RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] XML? Just Say NO !

2004-07-12 Thread Kevin Bilbee
Well we differ here on this point. XML is much more verbose and will explode the size of the config files probably 1000 fold Here is a sample Now SPFFAIL spf failx 14 0 After XML - Possible Sample Test name=SPFFAIL Typespf/TestType Actionfail/TestAction

RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] XML? Just Say NO !

2004-07-12 Thread Todd Holt
Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 4:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] XML? Just Say NO ! Well we differ here on this point. XML is much more verbose and will explode the size

RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] XML? Just Say ``NO`` !

2004-07-12 Thread Scott Fisher
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] XML? Just Say NO ! Well we differ here on this point. XML is much more verbose and will explode the size of the config files probably 1000 fold Here is a sample Now SPFFAIL spf failx 14 0 After XML - Possible Sample