Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Buffer overflow in Ipswitch products

2006-09-12 Thread Sanford Whiteman
> My reading of Kevin Gills' message on 9/11 was that most everything but > rich text editing now works, and that rich text support will be in the > next release. Not my reading... >>Yes, we have added Safari support (all but the rich text editor) in >>the last sprint. This will be available in

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Buffer overflow in Ipswitch products

2006-09-12 Thread Sanford Whiteman
> The SMTP engine is largely unchanged since 8.0 was released. Geez, man, that is completely untrue. If that's your premise, sorry, that debate is on your planet, I'm not going there > Safari support is in 2001.1 for the first time. Then it's pretty strange how there's not a single post t

Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Buffer overflow in Ipswitch products

2006-09-12 Thread Mike N
The proof-of-concepts which have been tested on multiple versions also list a "not vulnerable" category if other versions have been tested. I get the feeling that Ipswitch has washed its hands of the previous version that is more than 90 days old. They take a passive approach to security;

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Buffer overflow in Ipswitch products

2006-09-11 Thread Sanford Whiteman
> On the IMail list they indicated that IMail 8.x is also affected and > possibly older versions as well. A non-Ipswitch poster said that an anonymous tech indicated so. We all know that if that was a first-level tech... their word is not exactly gold. True, the IMail product manager chimed in to