Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Percent

2001-11-05 Thread R. Scott Perry
What is the entry which goes in global.cfg for the Percent test? It should be PERCENT percent x x 10. Then, in the $default$.JunkMail file, you can use PERCENT HOLD or whatever you like. -Scott --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Weighting

2001-11-05 Thread R. Scott Perry
Is it possible to include the weighting (see below) at the Mid Log level? I'd like to see it, but I'd also like to avoid running the log at High. Weighting from Log (High): BADHEADERS:5 SPAMHEADERS:5 HEUR10:5 . Total weight = 15 That will be done for the next release.

Re: MISSING_REVERSE_DNS:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Slow down ofmail?

2001-11-05 Thread R. Scott Perry
Actually, there is no delay in the new beta version. The ORBL test has gone under, and its nameservers are stuck in a black hole and not responding, causing a timeout. After removing the ORBL test, the last few E-mails we received were scanned in about one second. I guess that means

Re: MISSING_REVERSE_DNS:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Slow down of mail?

2001-11-05 Thread Webmaster Oilfield Directory
- Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 2:57 PM Subject: Re: MISSING_REVERSE_DNS:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Slow down of mail? Actually, there is no delay in the new beta version. The ORBL test has gone

Re: MISSING_REVERSE_DNS:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Slow down of mail?

2001-11-05 Thread Webmaster Oilfield Directory
Thanks for the info, i hear ya! - Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 4:37 PM Subject: Re: MISSING_REVERSE_DNS:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Slow down of mail? It might be a good idea. Unfortunately, just like