Hi Darrel,
Please add me to your list, I'd love to try it out
Best regards
Lachezar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of VanTech.Net
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 11:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
Darrel,
Add me to you list. I would love to be able to get some of this info.
Todd
- Original Message -
From: Darrell LaRock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 4:06 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Report System
Terry,
I used delog for
I've lowered the weight on Trustic in the last few days ... I'm
getting too many false positives ... I'm seeing IP's marked un-trusted
that are only being reported by one person.
Yesterday, saw the IP of Cnet.com blocked ... when I looked on Trustic
for the IP report, it was based on 3 reports,
Oh heck...
[Best AOL Voice On]
Me Too!
[AOL Voice Off]
Thanks,
Jeff
-- Original Message --
If you would like to try it out let me know and I will make it available..
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
If you would like to try it out let me know and I will make it available..
I'll jump on the bandwagon. I'd love to try that out as well.
-Russ
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
Me too.
Brian T.
- Original Message -
From: Russ Uhte (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 9:45 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Report System
If you would like to try it out let me know and I will make it
available..
Yes, Trustic are about to overwhole their system to face these issues. In
the meantime, you should submit a positive recommendation for the IP
addresses you mentioned.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Dodell
Sent: Friday, August 01,
-- Original Message --
From: Omar K. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 17:13:23 +0200
Yes, Trustic are about to overwhole their system to face these issues. In
the meantime, you should submit a positive recommendation
add me, also
At 12:17 PM 8/1/2003 +0200, you wrote:
Hi Darrel,
Please add me to your list, I'd love to try it out
Best regards
Lachezar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of VanTech.Net
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 11:40 PM
http://news.com.com/2100-1038_3-5058610.html?tag=fd_lede1_hed
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe
Darrel,
Maybe you should start charging for it. As long as you're not...please
include me. (Actually, I'd consider a donation if it works as well as
you claim.)
Thanks,
Shayne Embry
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Add me to the list too - a donation will be in order...
Sincerely,
Randy Armbrecht
Global Web SolutionsR, Inc.
804-346-5300 ext. 1
877-800-GLOBAL (4562) ext. 1
http://globalweb.net
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shayne Embry
Sent:
Hey, Don't leave me out! It looks like it's just what the Dr. ordered.
Dave Jordan
- Original Message -
From: GlobalWeb.net Webmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 11:23 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Report System
Add me to the list too -
Darrell,
Please add us to the list. We would be most grateful for your reporting
software.
Thank You,
JR Tatum, President
Performance Dimensions, Inc.
(336) 774-1849
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.triadnetwork.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Please add me too.
Would like to see it.
Thanks
Heimir
- Original Message -
From: James James [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:53 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Report System
I hate filling the list with another of these, but I would like
I would be interested as well, thank you.
Erik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of i360 Support
Sent: Friday, August 1, 2003 09:14
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Report System
Please add me too.
Would
Darrell,
looks like you've got a request from everyone on the Declude list! I'd
like to add my name as well, it sounds like a very useful tool.
Paul
Terry,
I used delog for awhile, but I needed several other features
that did
not come with delog. So I developed an
It's become blatantly apparent that there is a VERY STRONG NEED for an
application such as this. Are the Declude people listening?
Terry
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of i360 Support
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 9:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Darrell,
Why don't you post a link to your program so we can all have a look at
it. It would avoid another 2000 of me toos. Just a thought.
BTW, me too... ;-)
Cheers,
Adrian
Darrell LaRock wrote:
Terry,
I used delog for awhile, but I needed several other features that did not
come
Their has been an overwhelming request for this much more than I have
anticipated.
I am setting up a webpage for this. I have to get the documentation
together, because there are a lot of options that need to be documented so
that you will actually be able to use.
I am hoping I will have
Omar,
Do you realize the e-mail that you send to this list has a date which is 15
days in the future?
Just Curious,
Dan
- Original Message -
From: Omar K. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2003 11:52 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Article: End of the
It's become blatantly apparent that there is a VERY STRONG NEED for an
application such as this. Are the Declude people listening?
With all the work that Scott and his interms do, I think this is perfectly
fine.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
Hello, All,
I've been reviewing the current v1.75 GLOBAL.CFG versus my current
GLOBAL.CFG and I had some questions about 3 tests...
OSSOFT
OSSRC
WIREHUB-DNSBL
The WIREHUB-DNSBL looks like it has been replaced by EASYNET-DNSBL. Is that
correct?
OSSOFT is no longer in the v1.75 GLOBAL.CFG. Is
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dan Geiser
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 1:35 PM
To: Declude JunkMail
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Discrepancies in New GLOBAL.CFG
Hello, All,
I've been reviewing the current v1.75 GLOBAL.CFG versus
OSSRC is still in GLOBAL.CFG but it has been commented out and
moved to the
Not Commonly Used section. Does anyone know why this was changed? It
also still seems to be a valid test and it's not a pay service so I don't
understand the move.
The reason for that is that the OSSRC test is the
Looks like they expired the link, only the domain reveals what you saw:
http://tfexp.com/
I have a perspective client considering challenge/response, another good reason not to.
Dan
On Wednesday, July 30, 2003 4:58, Omar K. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I fell for it, so im assuming that joe
Thanks for pointing that out Dan,
Id like to think that I am really ahead of all of you guys but I was looking
at the windows calendar for a future date and must have clicked ok instead
of cancel :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan
Some-much of this local/remote distiction can be resolved by running Declude infront
of/seperate from your actual email server. The negative is that it kills auto
whitlising.
Dan
On Wednesday, July 30, 2003 12:01, Karen D. Oland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree. We have the same problem here
FYI Spamdomians failed this. Which it
should have based on my SP entry ofcom.although it was a valid
email. Its an invoice sent by someone to my client though intuits online
invoicing system.
What is everyone using for "com."
Received: from mail2.smart-mail.net [65.16.167.134]
by
Title: Message
I
think that while the spamdomains test is wonderful, many people are trying to
overuse it as a test. IMO it is there to protect against forgeries of the
major e-mailservices, and it does that task great. It's usefullness
declines when it is used in a greater fashion. For
If you're describing % of false positives/negatives, it can't be done automatically.
Any system smart enough to tell what should have from what shouldn't have to calculate
the difference would simply do as it should and be 100% accurate.
I get my numbers by taking the total messages and
31 matches
Mail list logo
