[Declude.JunkMail] Solution for Mail-backup

2004-10-12 Thread Markus Gufler
A customer is asking us if we can keep a copy of each incomming and outgoing message for his mailboxes on our server. I have no problem to set up declude.junkmail rules/actions so that incomming messages are copied to a separate mailbox. But we use also WHITELIST AUTH and so I can't find a

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Solution for Mail-backup

2004-10-12 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Why not use the Imail copyall function? John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus Gufler Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 12:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Solution for Mail-backup

2004-10-12 Thread Markus Gufler
Why not use the Imail copyall function? Thanks but I believe this will not work on a server hosting hundreds of virtual domains and thousands of mailboxes if only one virtual domain should be backed up. At the moment I'm looking to find a solution with imail rules. (never used them up to now

[Declude.JunkMail] Decoded subject lines in logfile

2004-10-12 Thread Markus Gufler
As I know declude.junkmail is able to decode base64 or quoted-printable subject lines. Would it be possible to write this decoded lines in the logfile? Markus --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Solution for Mail-backup

2004-10-12 Thread Jeff Pereira
You should be able to use Imail's copyall function in conjunction with Imail rules - Original Message - From: Markus Gufler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 4:28 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Solution for Mail-backup Why not use the Imail

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Solution for Mail-backup

2004-10-12 Thread Markus Gufler
You should be able to use Imail's copyall function in conjunction with Imail rules At the moment I'm watching how the solution will work. As virtual hosts in Imail can't have outbound rules I've set a rule for the only primary host looking if the mailfrom adress contains the customers domain

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Solution for Mail-backup

2004-10-12 Thread Jeff Pereira
I thinh you may be able to just set up a rule to look in the header for the virtual domain you are looking for -- I think this will get moth incoming and outgoing jp On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 13:44:19 +0200, Markus Gufler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You should be able to use Imail's copyall function

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Solution for Mail-backup

2004-10-12 Thread Markus Gufler
I thinh you may be able to just set up a rule to look in the header for the virtual domain you are looking for -- I think this will get moth incoming and outgoing Hmm, will this really work? In Imail v8 I can se only the inbound rules tab for virtual hosts. I've tested this before by

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Solution for Mail-backup

2004-10-12 Thread Jeff Pereira
I think I did it as a rule on the copyall user's account... - Original Message - From: Markus Gufler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 8:11 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Solution for Mail-backup I thinh you may be able to just set up a rule

[Declude.JunkMail] 6.3 Acting as a gateway for domains on other servers

2004-10-12 Thread Mike Wiegers
6.3 Acting as a gateway for domains on other servers The only catch as far as Declude JunkMail is concerned is that IMail will treat the E-mail to the gateway domain as outgoing mail, since it is not stored on the IMail server. Therefore, by default, the outgoing actions in the

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 6.3 Acting as a gateway for domains on other servers

2004-10-12 Thread Kris McElroy
Do you have Junkmail Pro? This feature is only available in Declude Junkmail Pro. Thanks, Kris McElroy [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Wiegers Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 9:24 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Solution for Mail-backup

2004-10-12 Thread Sanford Whiteman
I think I did it as a rule on the copyall user's account... This is the recommended method. --Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SpamAssassin plugs into

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 6.3 Acting as a gateway for domains on other servers

2004-10-12 Thread Mike Wiegers
Yes.. Declude JunkMail Status: PRO version registered. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kris McElroy Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 9:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 6.3 Acting as a gateway for

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 6.3 Acting as a gateway for domains on other servers

2004-10-12 Thread Mike Wiegers
Debug helps.. 10/12/2004 11:22:50 Q04d82aa002a0abe8 E-mail whitelisted - automatically passing all spam tests [declude.com] I was sending the test messages from the Declude Spam Tester site. Removed declude from the whitelist and it looks like everything will work now. Thanks, Mike

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 6.3 Acting as a gateway for domains on other servers

2004-10-12 Thread Sanford Whiteman
The only catch as far as Declude JunkMail is concerned is that IMail will treat the E-mail to the gateway domain as outgoing mail, since it is not stored on the IMail server. Note that standard IMail store-and-forward setups create implicit 'nobody' aliases, friends to spammers

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Solution for Mail-backup

2004-10-12 Thread Markus Gufler
I think I did it as a rule on the copyall user's account... Ah, now I understand. The idea is to activate the copy-all function and set rules for the copyall mailbox so that messages for/from a certain domain will be forwarded to another backup-mailbox and all other messages will be deleted.

[OT] RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 6.3 Acting as a gateway for domains on other servers

2004-10-12 Thread Mike Wiegers
Sandy, I have setup the gateway in my hosts file and the MX records for that gateway is pointing to my declude server. It looks like what you are saying is my server will try to process every non-user to the gateway machine, correct?? Does this script create registry keys for the gateway users,

Re: [OT] RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 6.3 Acting as a gateway for domains on other servers

2004-10-12 Thread Sanford Whiteman
I have setup the gateway in my hosts file and the MX records for that gateway is pointing to my declude server. It looks like what you are saying is my server will try to process every non-user to the gateway machine, correct?? Yes. Does this script create registry keys for the

RE: [OT] RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 6.3 Acting as a gateway for domains on other servers

2004-10-12 Thread Mike Wiegers
Where would I manually create these aliases? -Original Message- Does this script create registry keys for the gateway users, or how does this work? It creates and updates IMail aliases for a remote userbase retrieved over LDAP. You just schedule it to run every 5-10 minutes.

Re[2]: [OT] RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 6.3 Acting as a gateway for domains on other servers

2004-10-12 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Where would I manually create these aliases? Manually? Under a virtual host, like any aliases. --Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SpamAssassin plugs into

[Declude.JunkMail] Spammers working OT

2004-10-12 Thread Michael Jaworski
We are running Declude and Sniffer on Imail 8.05. One of our nationally accessed domains, xyz.com, has been under constant dictionary attacks with 320,000 messages per day average for 265 e-mail addresses/aliases. After I installed our first Linux box as a gateway with Postfix the number dropped

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spammers working OT

2004-10-12 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Within the last few days it appears the spammers figured it out and are not using the mx record and going direct to the mail server. Anyone seen this? Yep, of course. The only course of action is to ensure that all servers that accept unauthenticated mail for your domain

Re: [OT] RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 6.3 Acting as a gateway for domains on other servers

2004-10-12 Thread Dave Doherty
Sandy- Do you know what Ipswitch's position is on licensing the gateway server? It looks like the small business version is limited to five domains, but is that domains with mailboxes only? Will the SB version do OK with several hundred domains when acting only as a gateway? Or do we need to

RE: [OT] RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 6.3 Acting as a gateway for domains on other servers

2004-10-12 Thread Matt Goodhue
We have Imail setup as an Gateway server. I contacted Imail because I had the same question. They told me that you can use the small business edition as a gateway. There is no limit on domains when it is acting as an gateway. Matt Goodhue -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [OT] RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 6.3 Acting as a gateway for domains on other servers

2004-10-12 Thread Matt
Dave, Ipswitch won't allow for gatewaying except on IMail Small Business or IMail Professional. If you or anyone else is interested in just a simple backup gateway, I've got a server that does address validation that is severely underutilized (hardly ever reaches 1% CPU utilization on minute

Re: [OT] RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 6.3 Acting as a gateway for domains on other servers

2004-10-12 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Matt, Can you give a rough overview on how you integrated ORF on your boxes? Thanks Darrell --- Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.

Re: [OT] RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 6.3 Acting as a gateway for domains on other servers

2004-10-12 Thread Matt
Sure. The backup server just runs MS SMTP with ORF (ORF works within MS SMTP). I use the address blacklist in ORF to limit just addresses that match what I give, and it will accept wildcards for the domains that I don't currently have complete address lists for. ORF loads the config from an

[Declude.JunkMail] How did this trigger my filter?

2004-10-12 Thread Goran Jovanovic
Hi, I have the following line in a filter: BODY 20 CONTAINS You=92ll It triggered on an HTML e-mail: 10/06/2004 19:20:02 Q7d8a0030012efa97 Triggered BODY CONTAINS filter WORDMASK on You=92ll [weight-20; you=92ll find marketing tools ]. Now in the HTML e-mail there is only one

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] How did this trigger my filter?

2004-10-12 Thread Matt
I would make sure that your view source is the true source and not an interpreted source. It appears that you are using Exchange Web mail, and I wouldn't be surprised to see this behavior in a Web mailer. This is almost guaranteed to be the case here. Matt Goran Jovanovic wrote: Hi, I have

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] How did this trigger my filter?

2004-10-12 Thread Goran Jovanovic
Matt, The view source is from my Outlook client so not sure if it really is true source or not. Is there anything in the headers that would indicate that this was sent via an Exchange Web mail? I have the headers but do not really see anything indicating what sent it. There is no X-Mailer etc.

RE: [OT] RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 6.3 Acting as a gateway for domains on other servers

2004-10-12 Thread Troy Hickerson
I wanted to point out that Imail does have a limitation which relates to the number of domains. (Hopefully it may save you some time which I spent learning the hard way.) When you setup a domain as a gateway with Imail you need to add an entry to the HOSTS file and also allow relaying for the IP

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] How did this trigger my filter?

2004-10-12 Thread Matt
I was looking at your headers and not those of this message because you didn't share those. That also wouldn't have any effect so don't get caught up on that. I believe that the Properties Details Message Source option in Outlook Express does not MIME decode the source, so it would be