[Declude.JunkMail] Fake YouTube Spam

2007-08-27 Thread David Barker
BODY10 PCRE (href=http://((?:25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[01]?[0-9][0-9]?)\.){3}(?:25[0-5]|2[0- 4][0-9]|[01]?[0-9][0-9]?)/http://www) Will catch any IP: a href=http://68.183.201.153/;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxmwjEj2TtE/a David Barker VP Operations Declude Your Email security is our

[Declude.JunkMail] Process Flow

2007-08-27 Thread Dean Lawrence
Hi All, I have a couple of questions regarding the process flow for junkmail. 1. If I have a test defined in the global config file, but do not add it to the $default$.junkmail file, how is test handled? Is the test used and then given a WARN action by default? 2. If I have a test defined in

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Process Flow

2007-08-27 Thread David Barker
1. The test in the global.cfg are ALWAYS run. The $default$.junkmail is just the ACTION. WARN means to write additional information to the headers. 2. No. 3. The test will run but no specific action will take place as it will use the per domain $default$.junkmail if the email recipient is of

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Process Flow

2007-08-27 Thread Dean Lawrence
Hi David, Thanks for the quick reply. So basically, unless an action is specified; either on a global, per domain, or per user basis; a test will be run and whatever weight it has will be applied to the overall weight of the email. Then, the only way that this test will have any bearing is if I

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Process Flow

2007-08-27 Thread David Barker
Correct. If you want to exclude specific tests you can negate the weights by using a filter eg. In your global.cfg -- SPAMCOP ip4rbl.spamcop.net 127.0.0.2 8 0 In your filter -- This specifies the condition that

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Process Flow

2007-08-27 Thread Dean Lawrence
That's great. Thanks again David. Dean On 8/27/07, David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Correct. If you want to exclude specific tests you can negate the weights by using a filter eg. In your global.cfg -- SPAMCOP ip4rbl.spamcop.net

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Process Flow

2007-08-27 Thread Dean Lawrence
Hi Dave, One last question regarding this; if no action is specified and an email fails that particular test, will it be logged? I know it will not be added to the header, but will I be able to see that it failed in the log? Also, if so, do I need to have a specific log level set before it shows

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Process Flow

2007-08-27 Thread David Barker
Yes it would be logged the minimum setting for the logging would be LOW. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean Lawrence Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 12:43 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Process Flow Hi

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Process Flow

2007-08-27 Thread Dean Lawrence
Thanks again. I've been using your product for a number of years and could not be happier with it. Keep up the great work. Dean On 8/27/07, David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes it would be logged the minimum setting for the logging would be LOW. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

[Declude.JunkMail] Error in envelope file

2007-08-27 Thread Mon Mariola - Rubén
Recently I have changed to Declude v4.3.59 and SmarterMail v4.3. When watching the archives logs of declude junkmail I find some lines with the following error: -- 08/26/2007 08:49:09.802 147478139 Error in envelope file (Failed): c:\SmarterMail\Spool\proc\work\147478139.hdr