I have .mx07.com in
my kill file. Should it not kill the message below? I even stopped
and restarted the smtp service.
Received: from
mail04-platinum.mx07.com [209.66.76.69] by ncws.com with ESMTP
(SMTPD32-8.03) id A4791D5500A6; Sat, 15 Nov 2003 14:11:05 -0800Received:
(from [EMAIL
Danny,
If you are using the fromfile functionality in Declude, it searches
the MAILFROM (from the SMTP envelope given in HELO) and not the From
address listed in the E-mail's headers. I can certainly be different.
You can get Declude to display this by adding the following line to your
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Danny
KlopferSent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 2:20 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] kill
file
I have .mx07.com
in my kill file. Should it not kill the message below? I even
A little food for thought on using the Imail kill file versus the declude
blacklist...
The Imail kill file refuses the mail at the SMTP level which may alert the
spammer that your blocking them. Not to mention that the cpu burden is put
on smtp32.exe instead of passing it off to declude.exe
If I use the DELETE option for emails that fail the test for my black
list, would that not server the same purpose? Plus make it a bit more
friendlier to my server?
It would serve the same purpose, *except* that the sender will not know
what happened. The load will be a little more than if
I have been retaliated against many times by spammers :-) and
would rather not anger them because they have already proven
themselves to be unscrupulous individuals.
I have to agree, if we gave them a challenge they will try harder.
I would rather them not know what we are doing, though
~
- Original Message -
From: Rick Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 5:02 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] kill file vs blacklist
A little food for thought on using the Imail kill file versus the declude
blacklist...
The Imail kill file refuses
