RE: [Declude.JunkMail] white list or positive weight for a specific To address?

2011-06-21 Thread Rick Davidson
Thanks Sandy, interesting response, it got me thinking a bit wouldnt the spammer/attacker need to have delegated authority over the source ip address space and control of DNS infrastructure to forge a PTR record? I have been doing this a while and I dont recall ever seeing a message

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] white list or positive weight for a specific To address?

2011-06-21 Thread Sanford Whiteman
wouldnt the spammer/attacker need to have delegated authority over the source ip address space and control of DNS infrastructure to forge a PTR record? Well, either delegated authority *or* a subscriber agreement with the ISP that allows PTRs to be requested/modified. For example,

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] white list or positive weight for a specific To address?

2011-06-19 Thread IMail Admin
“It is just our way.” That has such a Zen sound to it, like you must find your own path to enlightenment. I am still confused by both your suggestion and Randy’s. They both seem to be based on the From line, which would not be declude.com. Here are the first few header lines from one of

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] white list or positive weight for a specific To address?

2011-06-19 Thread Rick Davidson
Why not use the HELO or REVDNS? REVDNS is going to be the safest because of the difficulty in forging it HELO -10 CONTAINS smtp.declude.com or HELO WHITELIST CONTAINS smtp.declude.com REVDNS -10 CONTAINS smtp.declude.com or REVDNS WHITELIST CONTAINS smtp.declude.com or even blanket the headers

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] white list or positive weight for a specific To address?

2011-06-19 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Why not use the HELO or REVDNS? REVDNS is going to be the safest because of the difficulty in forging it Not always... if the domain has a hard-fail SPF record that isn't *itself* dependent on forgeable records (only uses IPs and forward DNS entries), then the MAILFROM can't

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] white list or positive weight for a specific To address?

2011-06-18 Thread Randy A
On my declude config, I set up a GoodMailList test text file, added a negative point value to this test, and then I add any of my customer’s email lists that were getting flagged by declude Sincerely, Randy Armbrecht Global Web Solutions, Inc. Office: 804.442.5300 option 1 Toll

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] white list or positive weight for a specific To address?

2011-06-18 Thread IMail Admin
Can you give me the line you used in the config file? From: Randy A Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 12:18 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] white list or positive weight for a specific To address? On my declude config, I set up a GoodMailList test text file,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] white list or positive weight for a specific To address?

2011-06-18 Thread Randy A
We scale on a base of mark as Spam at 15; quarantine at 20; delete at 30 In my global.config file I have: FILTER-GOODMAILINGLISTS fromfileC:\...path to file…\filter-GoodMailingLists.txt x -20 0 In the default.junkmail file:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] white list or positive weight for a specific To address?

2011-06-18 Thread Nick Hayer
An easy way to whitelist these in your global.cfg WHITELISTFROM@declude.com -Nick MadRiverAccess.com|Skywaves.com Tech Support US/Canada 877-873-6482 or International +1-802-229-6574 Emergency Support 24/7: supp...@skywaves.net General and Non-Emergency support ticket:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] white list or positive weight for a specific To address?

2011-06-18 Thread Randy A
Yes but if I remember correctly there is a limit on the number of whitelist entries you can have in the cfg file (200 I think – please correct me if I am wrong) so depending on the number of domains you are hosting email for, this could fill up at some point. We use the whitelist technique for

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] white list or positive weight for a specific To address?

2011-06-18 Thread IMail Admin
I like the idea of reverse weights over whitelisting. The problem with whitelisting is that the mail is guaranteed to get through. I just want to counter-weight mail from a list. For example, I have one list that typically shows up with a weight of 4-6. I can counter that with –4 and then

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] white list or positive weight for a specific To address?

2011-06-18 Thread IMail Admin
I’m confused on what part of the envelope this is filtering on. List messages show up in the mailbox as From Contributor (such as From: Randy A) and To Listname (such as To: Declude.JunkMail). I want the positive weight to only apply to list messages, which means the weight has to be filtered

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] white list or positive weight for a specific To address?

2011-06-18 Thread Nick Hayer
yup there is some sort of cap in global.cfg the around that is with a whitelist file that would contain entries like: MAILFROMWHITELISTCONTAINS@declude.com and clearly implementation technique is a personal thing :) We use compensatory filters to add/subtract weights as needed,