Hi Scott,
Is there a information page where you explain the different
vulnerabilities and what are tipical causes of this?
We have here a lot of hold messages with:
Outlook 'Blank Folding' Vulnerability
Outlook 'CR' Vulnerability
Outlook 'Boundary Space Gap' Vulnerability
Hi Scott,
Is there a certain reason why there is no variable containing the single
recipient of the message?
I've created a ASP-Script to requeue a spoolfile hold by an
vulnerability.
Now there is the following problem:
A send a message with a vulnerability to B and C
B is a user on our server,
Is there a certain reason why there is no variable containing the single
recipient of the message?
Yes -- because there is no single recipient (unless there is only a single
recipient, in which case %ALLRECIPS% will display that recipient). :)
Is there no variable containing the SMTP-Recipient
The problem is that while there is always only a single
sender, there are
often multiple recipients. So for the E-mail with a
vulnerability sent to
B and C, and there was a variable to produce a single
recipient, would you
want it to be B or C? Therein lies the problem.
From where
From where JM gathers the X-RCPT-TO value?
That is added by IMail, when the E-mail is being delivered.
At that point, IMail has the single E-mail with multiple recipients, and it
goes through each recipient and stores a copy of the E-mail in
their mailbox. Since it has access to the
That is added by IMail, when the E-mail is being delivered.
At that point, IMail has the single E-mail with multiple
recipients, and it
goes through each recipient and stores a copy of the E-mail in
their mailbox. Since it has access to the individual
mailbox at that
time, it is
Is there a way to add a new SKIPIFMULTIPLERECIPS criteria?
So we can send vulnerability warnings at least to single recipients.
Perhaps, but:
I mean sending the warning back to the sender so that he can force
sending is not a good solution.
%ALLRECIPS% will only include the sender if the sender
%ALLRECIPS% will only include the sender if the sender sent a copy to
himself, through your mailserver.
If you are not running an open relay, that means that the %ALLRECIPS%
notification would only go to the sender if the sender was a
user of yours.
I intended to send the warning to
%ALLRECIPS% will only include the sender if the sender sent a copy to
himself, through your mailserver.
If you are not running an open relay, that means that the %ALLRECIPS%
notification would only go to the sender if the sender was a
user of yours.
I intended to send the warning to
I'm guessing you would want the link to go to the recipient,
rather than
the sender (since the sender will obviously want the E-mail
to go through
if he intended for the vulnerability to be there).
Yes. Exactly what I've said 2 mails before.
(Probably my english is not good enough :-)
A client of ours is asking if it is possible to send a notification to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] as well as a notification to the user.
Is it possible to do this for just one domain while leaving the others as
is?
Thank you
Harry Vanderzand
inTown Internet Computer Services
11 Belmont Ave. W.
A client of ours is asking if it is possible to send a notification to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] as well as a notification to the user.
Is it possible to do this for just one domain while leaving the others as
is?
Unfortunately, I can't think of any way to accomplish that for just one domain.
Hello Markus,
Thank you for your contribution. I'm releasing the hold messages using a
program alias in IMail, so the recipients could just send an email to
the alias address to unblock the email. Following is the little cmd
script, as you can see it uses some of the GNU tools for Win32 that you
13 matches
Mail list logo
