Are there any other cautions with using this feature other than releasing mail that
was held by junkmail's HOLD action?
Such as if junkmail uses the ROUTETO or MAILBOX action prior to the virus scanning,
are there any conditions that would cause the email to not get virus scanned?
Bill
-O
Is there any "back door" to declude virus or some way to release it so that
is can be scanned by declude virus before it is delivered?
Not after Declude JunkMail catches it. Although there is a way you could
get Declude to scan the E-mail again, Declude JunkMail would catch it again.
Is there any "back door" to declude virus or some way to release it so that
is can be scanned by declude virus before it is delivered?
Dan
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
> Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 9:19 AM
> To: [E
I had one a week ago or so. It was an online order or something for a
client.
Let me see if I can find it.
John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
www.reliancesoft.com
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.
If anyone is catching E-mails from walmart.com that contain the Outlook
'CR' Vulnerability (or any other vulnerability), would it be possible to
E-mail me one of the D*.SMD files from the \Imail\spool\virus directory? I
am working with them on fixing this problem, but it seems to be sporadic,
> I assume that one downside is that the spam folder could possibly contain
> held spam emails that are do contain viruses, because they were held for
> spam before they got scanned for viruses, right? My question is, what
will
> happen if we place them back into the queue, then they will be deliv
To enable this feature, do we just put AVAFTERJM ON in the virus.cfg file?
Correct, and:
I assume that one downside is that the spam folder could possibly contain
held spam emails that are do contain viruses, because they were held for
spam before they got scanned for viruses, right?
Correct.
So
To enable this feature, do we just put AVAFTERJM ON in the virus.cfg file?
I assume that one downside is that the spam folder could possibly contain
held spam emails that are do contain viruses, because they were held for
spam before they got scanned for viruses, right? My question is, what will
> Is there anything to consider before using AVAFTERJM? We are getting so
much
> spam with Outlook
> vulnerabilities that are currently being caught by Virus, and I'd love to
have them
> blocked first by
> JunkMail. I just want to be sure there is no risk to doing this.
There is a big risk in doin
What makes me worrying is that quarantined emails (declude virus) have the
X-Declude Headers from Declude Junkmail. This means that they must have been
scanned by junkmail, before declude virus comes in place. Am i right?
Not necessarily -- the Declude JunkMail headers may get added even if
Declu
Is there anything to consider before using AVAFTERJM?
Yes -- any E-mail quarantined by Declude JunkMail will not be scanned for
viruses, so if you later deliver the E-mail, it could contain a virus.
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
> I have V 1.65 in place and I do not have the term "AVAFTERJM" in any
config
> file.
>
> So, are spam mails scanned for viri although the AV quarantined emails
have
> the Junkmail headers?
Pre 1.68 beta versions added some JunkMail headers before Virus scanning.
This was changed in 1.68 beta as
Is there anything to consider before using AVAFTERJM? We are getting so much spam with
Outlook
vulnerabilities that are currently being caught by Virus, and I'd love to have them
blocked first by
JunkMail. I just want to be sure there is no risk to doing this.
Thanks,
Paul Navarre
> With v1.68
> E-mails quarantined by Declude JunkMail will have been scanned
> for viruses,
> unless you change the default settings (using the AVAFTERJM
> setting). Here
> are the possible orders:
>
> With v1.67 and earlier, default settings:
> [1] Declude Hijack
> [2] Declude Virus
>
> found at http://www.declude.com/junkmail/manual.htm :-) -
> Processing Order
> Both IMail and Declude have a number of different tests that they run on
> E-mail. The order used is as follows:
>
> 1. IMail's Control Access file (to block IPs)
> 2. IMail's Kill List (to block return addres
Can anybody tell me in which order different Declude products (virus,
junkmail, hijack, ...) work on mails?
Are mails, which are quarantined by junkmail, scanned for viri before?
E-mails quarantined by Declude JunkMail will have been scanned for viruses,
unless you change the default settings (us
Hello,
found at http://www.declude.com/junkmail/manual.htm :-) -
Processing Order
Both IMail and Declude have a number of different tests that they run on
E-mail. The order used is as follows:
1. IMail's Control Access file (to block IPs)
2. IMail's Kill List (to block return addresses)
Can anybody tell me in which order different Declude products (virus,
junkmail, hijack, ...) work on mails?
Are mails, which are quarantined by junkmail, scanned for viri before?
Hermann
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from
18 matches
Mail list logo