RE: [Declude.Virus] MyDoom going to non existent users

2004-01-27 Thread Karen D. Oland
You don't by chance have your system set up to relay for local addresses do you? I ask because IMAIL is accepting the message and the message appears to be from a local username (probably forged -- unless you are seeing infected emails from your actual users). The copyall account should not be

RE: [Declude.Virus] Current Forging Virus list

2003-11-25 Thread Karen D. Oland
I've also seen these identified with forged addresses: FORGINGVIRUSMimail FORGINGVIRUSDumar FORGINGVIRUSSober FORGINGVIRUSHolar Is this a good current list? FORGINGVIRUS Braid FORGINGVIRUS Bridex FORGINGVIRUS Bugbear FORGINGVIRUS Hybris FORGINGVIRUS Lentin FORGINGVIRUS

RE: [Declude.Virus] mails from support@microsoft.com

2003-11-13 Thread Karen D. Oland
And don't forget to restart services after making the change, or it won't help. -Original Message- When there is a virus that is causing huge problems due to its volume (as was the case for many people with Sobig.F), the best thing to do is find the IPs they are being sent from, and

RE: [Declude.Virus] X-MailScanner line

2003-08-20 Thread Karen D. Oland
Using the logic that all servers on DSL are spammers, then, sure, all linux servers with mailscanners are guilty by associatio. -Original Message- From: Fritz Squib So you're saying if I send you an email from my Linux servers... which IS running MailScanner, then I am guilty by

RE: [Declude.Virus] SoBig.F?

2003-08-19 Thread Karen D. Oland
Are you seeing this as a pif inside an attached .eml? Although not caught by anything, I had a very strange undeliverable mail message in my box today that fit this criteria. The Sender and rDNS were both blank in the message. Received: from is3.auto-trol.com [143.198.15.20] by staffingtech.com

RE: [Declude.Virus] New interim release of Declude Virus to block Mimail's message.zip

2003-08-14 Thread Karen D. Oland
Except that the IMAIL server itself was not protected, unless another real-time scanner is installed. And any user that disabled their real-time scanner was not protected (as the emails kept coming thru). And users that didn't have their signatures set to download often. And home users that had

RE: [Declude.Virus] installing f-prot

2003-08-12 Thread Karen D. Oland
DOS scanner is not needed, use the 32 bit version instead. I believe you need the OnDemand Scanner option to get that. And you'll need the Scheduler/Updater to keep definitions up to date. Do NOT install the RealTime Protector (or it will run every time you reboot, shutting down scanning of

RE: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot now detecting Mimail

2003-08-07 Thread Karen D. Oland
Oddly enough, my fprot started catching the problem about 7 minutes before I downloaded the latest version (3.14a) -- I presume due to the 8/4/03 signatures that downloaded automatically. Karen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of EvanLists Sent:

RE: [Declude.Virus] W32.Mimail.A@mm Virus Fprot Definitions??

2003-08-06 Thread Karen D. Oland
Not only a new version, but a re-release of 3.14 (my download of that version is dated 6/26, but a new release date for 3.14 is shown on the web server now: 8/3/03). AFAIK, the software never updates online, you have to log in and download the new version and install manually. -Original

RE: [Declude.Virus] vuln question

2003-08-06 Thread Karen D. Oland
Thanks Scott. I'll forward to them, perhaps they can locate a real programmer and get it fixed. Karen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 6:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: