RE: [Declude.Virus] Fprot GDI Scanner lines.

2004-09-28 Thread marc
installed 1.80 declude virus (restart imail smtp) and sending the infected JPEG jpegcompoc.zip (http://www.gulftech.org/?node=downloads) it was not automatically detect and goes trough, using F-Prot 3.15B updated. virus.cfg: SCANFILE C:\Progra~1\FSI\F-Prot\fpcmd.exe /TYPE /SILENT /NOMEM

Re: [Declude.Virus] Fprot GDI Scanner lines.

2004-09-28 Thread Info Wind
Dear Marc, where did you get the dos scanner for f-prot? On the page of F-prot there is still only Version 3.15A available. Bye, Uwe - Original Message - From: marc [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 1:39 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Fprot GDI

Re: [Declude.Virus] Fprot GDI Scanner lines.

2004-09-28 Thread Matt
Could it be that the vulnerability detection doesn't work when enclosed in a zip file? That might be too big of a leap for Declude at the moment. I just tested the same and Declude missed it when zipped, F-Prot gave an error 8 which is a heuristic hit, and McAfee did in fact tag the virus

RE: [Declude.Virus] Fprot GDI Scanner lines.

2004-09-28 Thread Markus Gufler
, 2004 2:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Fprot GDI Scanner lines. Could it be that the vulnerability detection doesn't work when enclosed in a zip file? That might be too big of a leap for Declude at the moment. I just tested the same and Declude missed it when

RE: [Declude.Virus] Fprot GDI Scanner lines.

2004-09-28 Thread marc
Uwe is right: http://www.f-prot.com/news/gen_news/040924_release_all.html New versions of F-Prot Antivirus for Exchange and of F-Prot Antivirus for DOS will be released in the next few days. 3.15B just windows upgraded. but i understand, that the new release of Declude Virus will automatically

Re[2]: [Declude.Virus] Fprot GDI Scanner lines.

2004-09-28 Thread Sanford Whiteman
It seems fairly certain that this virus will be released within an encrypted zip Maybe, maybe not. The easiest way to get a payload delivered via e-mail right now is certainly to just pop a JPEG directly into an HTML message and rely on unpatched Outlook to render it;

RE: [Declude.Virus] Fprot GDI Scanner lines.

2004-09-28 Thread Nick
On 27 Sep 2004 at 17:31, R. Scott Perry wrote: The latest release of Declude Virus will automatically detect the GDIPlus.dll JPEG exploit. How can I confirm this? When I send myself the exploit I do not receive the email - good- but in my virus logs all I see is 'error in scannerx' and

Re: [Declude.Virus] Fprot GDI Scanner lines.

2004-09-28 Thread Matt
Yes, I doubt that in the early examples, there will be a need to do anything but pump out automatically executing E-mails with bogus JPG's. Over time infected JPG's might very well become a standard method of infection in along with all of the various forms which may include infected JPG's

RE: [Declude.Virus] Fprot GDI Scanner lines.

2004-09-28 Thread Keith Johnson
, is this true? Thanks for the aid, Keith -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Nick Sent: Tue 9/28/2004 9:40 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Fprot GDI Scanner lines

Re: [Declude.Virus] Fprot GDI Scanner lines.

2004-09-28 Thread Greg Little
As I recall, IF a virus scanner calls it bad, there is no further checking. (So, if your AV vender is doing their job right, you would have to disable the AV scanner(s) to test.) Greg Keith Johnson wrote: I too am seeing this same behavior. I am running HIGH logging and 1.80 version. All I

Re: [Declude.Virus] Fprot GDI Scanner lines. - slight change of topic multiple scanners

2004-09-28 Thread Nick
On 28 Sep 2004 at 10:43, Greg Little wrote: Greg, As I recall, IF a virus scanner calls it bad, there is no further checking. Is this for an individual scanner or multiple scanners? All the scanners run (sic) even if the one before discovers a virus on my system. -Nick . --- [This E-mail

Re: [Declude.Virus] Fprot GDI Scanner lines. - slight change of topic multiple scanners

2004-09-28 Thread Greg Little
Good catch. ALL AV scanners will run. If one or serveral scanners finds a virus, then I belive the new JPEG tests in 1.80 will be ignored. (This would complicate confirmation testing for the new JPEG test) Greg Nick wrote: On 28 Sep 2004 at 10:43, Greg Little wrote: Greg, As I

Re: [Declude.Virus] Fprot GDI Scanner lines.

2004-09-28 Thread Nick
: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:18:15 -0500 From: Terry Fritts [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: Smart Business Solutions, Inc. To: Nick [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: [Declude.Virus] Fprot GDI Scanner lines. Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [Declude.Virus] Fprot GDI Scanner lines.

2004-09-27 Thread Keith Johnson
] On Behalf Of Bill Landry Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2004 11:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Fprot GDI Scanner lines. - Original Message - From: Mark Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] Actually

RE: [Declude.Virus] Fprot GDI Scanner lines.

2004-09-27 Thread Keith Johnson
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Fprot GDI Scanner lines. Mark, What did you use to generate the GDI Exploit test file? Thanks Keith -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

RE: [Declude.Virus] Fprot GDI Scanner lines.

2004-09-27 Thread Dave Marchette
Title: RE: [Declude.Virus] Fprot GDI Scanner lines. Same here. Is there a way to make f-prot w\Declude catch these? -Original Message- From: Keith Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Johnson Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 12:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [Declude.Virus] Fprot GDI Scanner lines.

2004-09-27 Thread R. Scott Perry
Same here. Is there a way to make f-prot w\Declude catch these? The latest release of Declude Virus will automatically detect the GDIPlus.dll JPEG exploit. -Scott --- Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers

RE: [Declude.Virus] Fprot GDI Scanner lines.

2004-09-27 Thread Andy Schmidt
] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 05:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Fprot GDI Scanner lines. Same here. Is there a way to make f-prot w\Declude catch these? The latest release of Declude Virus will automatically detect the GDIPlus.dll JPEG exploit

RE: [Declude.Virus] Fprot GDI Scanner lines.

2004-09-27 Thread R. Scott Perry
Which one is considered the latest. Unless otherwise specified, latest refers to a beta or release. In this case, it is specifically the v1.80 release. Is that the mysterious latest interim 20 that end-users have announced on this list? There's nothing mysterious about interims. We do not

[Declude.Virus] Fprot GDI Scanner lines.

2004-09-25 Thread Mark Smith
Just did some testing with the POC and noticed that Fprot now is adding a new line to the report.txt: e:\imail\test\poc.jpg Contains the exploit named W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] So I had to add the line: REPORT Contains the exploit named To my virus.cfg file. My complete setup for F-Prot

RE: [Declude.Virus] Fprot GDI Scanner lines.

2004-09-25 Thread Mark Smith
: Saturday, September 25, 2004 2:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.Virus] Fprot GDI Scanner lines. Just did some testing with the POC and noticed that Fprot now is adding a new line to the report.txt: e:\imail\test\poc.jpg Contains the exploit named W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] So I had

RE: [Declude.Virus] Fprot GDI Scanner lines.

2004-09-25 Thread Markus Gufler
My complete setup for F-Prot is now: SCANFILE c:\progra~1\fsi\f-prot\FPcmd.exe /TYPE /SILENT /NOMEM /ARCHIVE=5 /NOBOOT /DUMB /SERVER /REPORT=report.txt VIRUSCODE 3 VIRUSCODE 6 VIRUSCODE 8 REPORTInfection: REPORTContains the exploit named

Re: [Declude.Virus] Fprot GDI Scanner lines.

2004-09-25 Thread Bill Landry
- Original Message - From: Mark Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] Actually this breaks Declude because Declude Virus can't look for multiple REPORT lines. Scott, How can we setup Declude Virus to look for multiple lines in the report.txt file? I've been running F-Prot Version 3.15b since

Re[2]: [Declude.Virus] Fprot GDI Scanner lines.

2004-09-25 Thread Sanford Whiteman
How can we setup Declude Virus to look for multiple lines in the report.txt file? Perhaps two almost-but-not-quite-identical SCANFILE entries with different REPORT entries...? Yes, double the resource utilization. Only a stopgap and not tested yet. --Sandy