Re: [Declude.Virus] Parallel processing

2004-12-10 Thread Matt
Andrew, A separate instance is set up for each message's attachments that are scanned, there is no cause for any concern. MAXATONCE was designed for licensing reasons and shouldn't be used in most installations. If you set MAXATONCE below the number of processes that might be launched (this i

RE: [Declude.Virus] Parallel processing

2004-12-10 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
0, 2004 3:46 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Parallel processing > > Thanks, John. Asking here was quicker than breaking out that free file > monitor (FileMon) from SysInternals.com ... > > Andrew 8) > > -Original Message- > Fr

RE: [Declude.Virus] Parallel processing

2004-12-10 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
f Colbeck, Andrew > Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 3:31 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Declude.Virus] Parallel processing > > I'm using the f-prot command line scanner, and the lines in the > virus.cfg look like this: > > SCANFILEC:\F-Prot\fpcmd.

RE: [Declude.Virus] Parallel processing

2004-12-10 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
: [Declude.Virus] Parallel processing Declude creates a separate directory for each message for scanning, so while the report name is the same, the directory is unique. John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PRO

[Declude.Virus] Parallel processing

2004-12-10 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
I'm using the f-prot command line scanner, and the lines in the virus.cfg look like this: SCANFILEC:\F-Prot\fpcmd.exe /ai /type /silent /archive=5 /dumb /noboot /nomem /packed /report=report.txt VIRUSCODE 3 VIRUSCODE 6 REPORT Infection: That's working fine, but in my testing I'm only p