[Declude.Virus] Scanning on forwarded addresses

2004-12-13 Thread Tandem Group
We run Declude Virus Standard with F-Prot and I am unsure whether a forwarded message is scanned. If an infected message is sent to a domain which is NOT set up for virus scanning, but is then forwarded to a domain which IS in the Virus_Domains list, will it then be quarantined? Thanks,

Re: [Declude.Virus] Scanning on forwarded addresses

2004-12-13 Thread R. Scott Perry
We run Declude Virus Standard with F-Prot and I am unsure whether a forwarded message is scanned. If an infected message is sent to a domain which is NOT set up for virus scanning, but is then forwarded to a domain which IS in the Virus_Domains list, will it then be quarantined? The way that

[Declude.Virus] Scanning attachments

2004-01-28 Thread John Carter
Does the extension name of a file play in the proper scanning of an attachment? IE: If we rename a ZIP file to say test.ziz to get by the ban on ZIPs. Will it still get scanned ok? (Idea is if I intentional rename the extension and I tell you in the message what I and how to save it, it is not

Re: [Declude.Virus] Scanning attachments

2004-01-28 Thread R. Scott Perry
Does the extension name of a file play in the proper scanning of an attachment? IE: If we rename a ZIP file to say test.ziz to get by the ban on ZIPs. Will it still get scanned ok? That's up to the virus scanner -- it *should* detect that it is a .ZIP file. F-Prot definitely does. So if it

RE: [Declude.Virus] Scanning attachments

2004-01-28 Thread Rodney Bertsch
too. - Rodney -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Carter Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 2:24 PM To: 'Declude Anti-virus Forum' Subject: [Declude.Virus] Scanning attachments Does the extension name of a file play in the proper scanning

Re: [Declude.Virus] Scanning Question

2003-11-12 Thread R. Scott Perry
Is it possible to not scan an email from a specific sender for vulnerabilities? No. They are tripping the 'blank folding' vuln. and we quarantine it. Thanks, Why do you want them to be allowed to send E-mail with vulnerabilities? -Scott ---

RE: [Declude.Virus] Scanning Question

2003-11-12 Thread John Shacklett
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Wednesday, 12 November 2003 5:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Scanning Question Is it possible to not scan an email from a specific sender for vulnerabilities? No. They are tripping the 'blank folding' vuln

RE: [Declude.Virus] Scanning Question

2003-11-12 Thread Keith Johnson
In this case, you can use the per-user settings to turn off virus scanning completely for the recipient. Scott, Is is possible (using per user settings) to simply suspend the vulnerability scanning, yet still keep the main virus scanning on? Thanks again for your time, Keith --- [This

RE: [Declude.Virus] Scanning Question

2003-11-12 Thread R. Scott Perry
Is is possible (using per user settings) to simply suspend the vulnerability scanning, yet still keep the main virus scanning on? No. The vulnerability detection can only be turned on/off globally. For an individual account (or domain), it can only be turned on/off along with virus

RE: [Declude.Virus] scanning timeout value

2003-01-22 Thread R. Scott Perry
Yes, IMail was processing mail through that period. We started receiving messages at our desktops that did not contain any declude headers, and that was my first indication that something was wrong. The log even shows SMTP refusals based on entries in my kill.lst file, so I'm guessing that IMail

RE: [Declude.Virus] scanning timeout value

2003-01-22 Thread John Shacklett
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Wednesday, 22 January 2003 1:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] scanning timeout value Yes, IMail was processing mail through that period. We started receiving messages at our desktops that did not contain any

[Declude.Virus] Scanning Process

2002-12-16 Thread Keith Johnson
Title: Scanning Process We are testing two virus scanners with Declude Pro and wanted to confirm or thoughts. Is it true that the scanners scan the file first, whether you have one, two, or five and then once done, the action on the virus is taken (i.e. quarantined)?

Re: [Declude.Virus] Scanning Process

2002-12-16 Thread R. Scott Perry
We are testing two virus scanners with Declude Pro and wanted to confirm or thoughts. Is it true that the scanners scan the file first, whether you have one, two, or five and then once done, the action on the virus is taken (i.e. quarantined)? That is correct. Declude Virus Pro will check

[Declude.Virus] scanning ?

2002-04-25 Thread Visual Web Norge
Hi Is this possible: On the gateway server i want to recieve the mail and when its passed to my mailserver it will be scanned by declude. So that the server just recieve the mail without scanning and first when it pass it to the other server it will be scanned on the way out ? Benny ---

Re: [Declude.Virus] scanning ?

2002-04-25 Thread R. Scott Perry
Is this possible: On the gateway server i want to recieve the mail and when its passed to my mailserver it will be scanned by declude. So that the server just recieve the mail without scanning and first when it pass it to the other server it will be scanned on the way out ? I'm not entirely

DSN:Re: [Declude.Virus] scanning ?

2002-04-25 Thread smb
Declude scans the e-mail when it is received by IMail. So if you set up a gateway server running Imail and Declude the gateway server will scan the e-mail before it delivers it to your other mail server. Stu At 06:10 PM 04/25/2002 +0200, you wrote: Hi Is this possible: On the gateway

RE: Re: [Declude.Virus] scanning ?

2002-04-25 Thread Visual Web Norge
. april 2002 18:56 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: DSN:Re: [Declude.Virus] scanning ? Declude scans the e-mail when it is received by IMail. So if you set up a gateway server running Imail and Declude the gateway server will scan the e-mail before it delivers it to your other mail server