PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul Ingram
| Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 10:58 AM
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Declude and F-Prot
|
|
| Man I hate that. I can't put desktop AV here so Declude is
| it! They scream they have to have Hotmail then scream they
| have a virus. I
I hope so!
Jim Rooth
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Madscientist
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 9:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Declude and F-Prot
Is it possible that the user also has an alternative
lf Of Madscientist
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 10:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Declude and F-Prot
Is it possible that the user also has an alternative account where they
cought the bug? (We have users who also insist on keeping hotmail or
other accounts - that is
Is it possible that the user also has an alternative account where they
cought the bug? (We have users who also insist on keeping hotmail or
other accounts - that is until they get hit with one of these).
_M
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On B
I hope so...job security is such a fleeting reality :)
Jim Rooth
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 8:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Declude and F-Prot
>The th
>The thing is, 655.120.133.104 is a central freight server...ergo it is
>being sent from a system that I thought I had protected.
Ah, I see now. Then I would guess that your original thought may be
correct (that it was picked up from another source, such as another E-mail
account).
