Re: [Declude.Virus] Order of scanning

2003-03-26 Thread R. Scott Perry
Are there any other cautions with using this feature other than releasing mail that was held by junkmail's HOLD action? Such as if junkmail uses the ROUTETO or MAILBOX action prior to the virus scanning, are there any conditions that would cause the email to not get virus scanned? No, that isn

Re: [Declude.Virus] Order of scanning

2003-03-25 Thread Bill B.
Bill -Original Message- From: "R. Scott Perry" Sent: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 11:19:14 -0500 Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Order of scanning >To enable this feature, do we just put AVAFTERJM ON in the virus.cfg file? Correct, and: >I assume that one downside is that the spam folder c

RE: [Declude.Virus] Order of scanning

2003-03-25 Thread R. Scott Perry
Is there any "back door" to declude virus or some way to release it so that is can be scanned by declude virus before it is delivered? Not after Declude JunkMail catches it. Although there is a way you could get Declude to scan the E-mail again, Declude JunkMail would catch it again.

RE: [Declude.Virus] Order of scanning

2003-03-25 Thread Dan Spangenberg
25, 2003 9:19 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Order of scanning > > > > >To enable this feature, do we just put AVAFTERJM ON in the > virus.cfg file? > > Correct, and: > > >I assume that one downside is that the spam folder could pos

RE: [Declude.Virus] Order of scanning

2003-03-25 Thread John Tolmachoff
> I assume that one downside is that the spam folder could possibly contain > held spam emails that are do contain viruses, because they were held for > spam before they got scanned for viruses, right? My question is, what will > happen if we place them back into the queue, then they will be deliv

RE: [Declude.Virus] Order of scanning

2003-03-25 Thread R. Scott Perry
To enable this feature, do we just put AVAFTERJM ON in the virus.cfg file? Correct, and: I assume that one downside is that the spam folder could possibly contain held spam emails that are do contain viruses, because they were held for spam before they got scanned for viruses, right? Correct. So

RE: [Declude.Virus] Order of scanning

2003-03-25 Thread Dan Spangenberg
ent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 7:55 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Order of scanning > > > Is there anything to consider before using AVAFTERJM? We are > getting so much spam with Outlook > vulnerabilities that are currently being caught by Virus, and I'

RE: [Declude.Virus] Order of scanning

2003-03-25 Thread John Tolmachoff
> Is there anything to consider before using AVAFTERJM? We are getting so much > spam with Outlook > vulnerabilities that are currently being caught by Virus, and I'd love to have them > blocked first by > JunkMail. I just want to be sure there is no risk to doing this. There is a big risk in doin

RE: [Declude.Virus] Order of scanning

2003-03-25 Thread R. Scott Perry
What makes me worrying is that quarantined emails (declude virus) have the X-Declude Headers from Declude Junkmail. This means that they must have been scanned by junkmail, before declude virus comes in place. Am i right? Not necessarily -- the Declude JunkMail headers may get added even if Declu

RE: [Declude.Virus] Order of scanning

2003-03-25 Thread R. Scott Perry
Is there anything to consider before using AVAFTERJM? Yes -- any E-mail quarantined by Declude JunkMail will not be scanned for viruses, so if you later deliver the E-mail, it could contain a virus. -Scott --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus

RE: [Declude.Virus] Order of scanning

2003-03-25 Thread John Tolmachoff
> I have V 1.65 in place and I do not have the term "AVAFTERJM" in any config > file. > > So, are spam mails scanned for viri although the AV quarantined emails have > the Junkmail headers? Pre 1.68 beta versions added some JunkMail headers before Virus scanning. This was changed in 1.68 beta as

RE: [Declude.Virus] Order of scanning

2003-03-25 Thread Paul Navarre
Is there anything to consider before using AVAFTERJM? We are getting so much spam with Outlook vulnerabilities that are currently being caught by Virus, and I'd love to have them blocked first by JunkMail. I just want to be sure there is no risk to doing this. Thanks, Paul Navarre > With v1.68

RE: [Declude.Virus] Order of scanning

2003-03-25 Thread Hermann Strassner
> E-mails quarantined by Declude JunkMail will have been scanned > for viruses, > unless you change the default settings (using the AVAFTERJM > setting). Here > are the possible orders: > > With v1.67 and earlier, default settings: > [1] Declude Hijack > [2] Declude Virus >

RE: [Declude.Virus] Order of scanning

2003-03-25 Thread Hermann Strassner
> found at http://www.declude.com/junkmail/manual.htm :-) - > Processing Order > Both IMail and Declude have a number of different tests that they run on > E-mail. The order used is as follows: > > 1. IMail's Control Access file (to block IPs) > 2. IMail's Kill List (to block return addres

Re: [Declude.Virus] Order of scanning

2003-03-25 Thread R. Scott Perry
Can anybody tell me in which order different Declude products (virus, junkmail, hijack, ...) work on mails? Are mails, which are quarantined by junkmail, scanned for viri before? E-mails quarantined by Declude JunkMail will have been scanned for viruses, unless you change the default settings (us

RE: [Declude.Virus] Order of scanning

2003-03-25 Thread Hirthe, Alexander
Hello, found at http://www.declude.com/junkmail/manual.htm :-) - Processing Order Both IMail and Declude have a number of different tests that they run on E-mail. The order used is as follows: 1. IMail's Control Access file (to block IPs) 2. IMail's Kill List (to block return addresses)