Hello Scott,
Saturday, June 4, 2005, 7:08:02 PM, you wrote:
SF I also use Terry's runclamscan with no issues.
SF I have had rare email melt downs when I was running runclamd. I could never
SF pin it firmly on anything. So I stopped the runclamd to see how it handles.
So you're saying you use
Looks like I have clam up and running. I'm testing it as my primary
scanner to make sure it catches viruses and all looks good so far. It
looks like it takes about as much CPU as FProt.
I have Rundclamd running as a service under LocalSystem. Should I
set the startup type to Automatic or leave it
, June 03, 2005 2:03 PM
To: John Carter
Subject: Re[4]: [Declude.Virus] Second Scanner
Looks like I have clam up and running. I'm testing it as my primary scanner
to make sure it catches viruses and all looks good so far. It looks like it
takes about as much CPU as FProt.
I have Rundclamd running
I'm running 2.0.6.16 and would consider it as stable as 1.82
- Original Message -
From: David Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: John Carter Declude.Virus@declude.com
Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 2:02 PM
Subject: Re[4]: [Declude.Virus] Second Scanner
Looks like I have clam up and running
