Re[5]: [Declude.Virus] RAR Support - why not?

2005-01-31 Thread David Sullivan
Hello Scott, Monday, January 31, 2005, 3:18:16 PM, you wrote: SF file. For example, if you have a line BANEXT EXE and BANZIPEXTS ON, then SF .EXE files within .ZIP files will be blocked. You can also use BANEZIPEXTS SF ON to do the same thing, but only applying to encrypted .ZIP files. I block

Re[5]: [Declude.Virus] RAR Support - why not?

2005-01-31 Thread R. Scott Perry
BANEZIPEXTS ON Then I repeat my list of banned extensions using: BANEXT BAS BANEXT BAT etc, etc. By my understanding, this will ban these extensions by themselves, ban these extensions when found within encrypted .zip files, NOT ban these extensions from within normal .zip files and with 1.82

Re: Re[5]: [Declude.Virus] RAR Support - why not?

2005-01-31 Thread Scott Fisher
the BANZIPEXTS ON is for non encypted zips the BANEZIPEXTS ON is for encrypted zips - Original Message - From: David Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.Virus@declude.com Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 2:30 PM Subject: Re[5]: [Declude.Virus] RAR Support - why not? Hello Scott