Thanks for that in-depth work. It helps to clear things up.
Now, go to sleep. I know you are not on the West coast, and it is already
midnight here.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
It looks like the BitDefender Free Edition includes the
command line scanner and excludes on-demand scanning. Just
what's needed for this application.
Unfortunately the free DOS edition does not return any error code. So it's
not possible to use it at the moment.
I've asked Bitdefender
Scanner Avg. TimeAvg.Processor% Peak%
F-Prot...0.1 seconds...0.482%.4.688%
AVG..0.5 seconds...0.934%52.316%
McAfee...0.6 seconds...0.900%73.433%
I've been testing all sorts of scanners and I couldn't get the free
versions of BitDefender to work.
We did some testing with it, and couldn't get the DOS version to even run
on NT or 2000 (it kept crashing as soon as it was started, but it would
work on other OS's). However, the Windows
Actually, I am running the newest F-Prot, and they're still slipping
through. Winzip opens these files just fine as well, and Symantec Corp
seems to be able to scan and detect the issue without any problems. They
keep rolling in, makes me a little nervous, and customers sure hate it.
Given
BTW, run clamd.exe and clamdscan.exe and notice a difference in
speed
Charles,
Did you start clamd and then leave the server logged on?
Terry
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To
ClamAV...1.0 seconds...2.303%...100.000%
Charles posted on this a while back.
Run clamd and link to clamdscan.exe (rather than clamscan).
Times and processor usage are much less.
Just running clamscan mine ranged from about a low of .8 to a high
of 3.6 sec. Buf after
I never updated after I posted that. I need to find a way to start and
check the clamd service. Since it runs Unix style under Cygwin, it creates
an instance and is out of sight, it doesn't fire correctly from a service
manager like fire daemon, at least not in the config I used. I have been
If yo ushow me how to set up your side of things, I'll show you how to
keep the daemon running :)
Matt
Terry Fritts wrote:
ClamAV...1.0 seconds...2.303%...100.000%
Charles posted on this a while back.
Run clamd and link to clamdscan.exe (rather than
First post. I really appreciate the discussion here, it's helped me a lot
to keep things working.
This is likely the wrong place to ask, but as of 11AM today, I've had over
14 illegal Imail listserv command messages, I believe to be originating
from . I've been getting a few of them
This happens to me too.
I am not using a copyall account.
Regards,
Steinar
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Baumbach
Sent: 1. april 2004 03:17
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Imail 8.1
since I
This happens to me too.
I am not using a copyall account.
It seems that IMail v8.1 will send forwarded mail through Declude a second
time.
We haven't confirmed this yet, and unfortunately Ipswitch hasn't provided
us with a copy of IMail v8.1 yet, so we are unable to test this yet, or
I've spent another few hours playing around with this and when I call
things correctly by starting clamd.exe and then configured Declude to
run clamdscan.exe, the scan times went from 1 second to between 0.08
seconds up to 0.6 seconds across about a dozen scans. I also tracked
this in
Terry, if you could explain the demime thing, that would be appreciated.
I'm sorry - I've been tied up all day working on name server issues.
The application I referenced earlier was an xmail mail server.
Declude is not available for it so I wrote my own program that is
called by xmail for
I may have to concur on this.
I have a user that receives messages forwarded from another account.
This morning, I saw the headers of one and it appeared to have be passed
through Declude twice, but I have had a hairy morning and have not been able
to follow up.
John Tolmachoff
Thanks for the explanation. I was hoping for something miraculous that
might be of benefit, but it looks like Declude does all of this already.
On a related topic, during my testing I found that while I was logged
into my server with pcANYWHERE instead of Terminal Services, I kept
seeing CMD
On a related topic, during my testing I found that while I was logged into
my server with pcANYWHERE instead of Terminal Services, I kept seeing CMD
windows pop up when AVG was scanning despite the /silent switch. I don't
ever recall seeing that before, but it's rare that I log in with
17 matches
Mail list logo
