RE: [Declude.Virus] Declude Virus inoperable for 13% of th year?

2009-06-04 Thread Patrick Childers
How much are we willing to pay?
 
It doesn't matter if it costs $5 or $5000 if the product doesn't work.
Especially when you, the developer, doesn't notice the problem for a month
and a half - especially when the problem has been reported by end users. Do
you not run your own product?
 
Maybe you don't realize this, but your whining customers put a level of
trust in your company whether you want it or not. This trust  is
automatic when you are dealing with A/V products that protect mail systems
and their networks. If you lose that trust, the cost won't matter. You won't
have enough customers to stay in business anyway.
 
Price you product at whatever you think you need to. The mail admins will
either buy it or they won't.
 
Maybe it's time for you to find another person to communicate with the list.
You certainly aren't giving your end users that warm and fuzzy feeling.
(IMO)
 
Regards,
 
~Patrick
 mailto:pchild...@hgbd.com  
 

  _  

From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 12:14 PM
To: declude.virus@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Declude Virus inoperable for 13% of th year?



Darin,

 

I accept your constructive criticism. With regard to the situation;

 

1.   We recognize that this was a serious failure

2.   The issue was highlighted and resolved in the quickest possible
time

3.   Procedural steps have been put in place to ensure that this does
not happen again.

4.   This was an unfortunate circumstance and I understand the
frustration on the part of Declude customers

5.   We make every effort to meet the needs of our customers

 

My statement regarding increased prices has less to do with this current
problem as it has to do with moving forward and preventing issues like this
in the future. More $ means more resources which means more can be done
which equates to less risk in all areas.  Declude has given good service,
value for money and a product that works for minimum $. I understand that
the expectation is always more for less, however if customers expect more
than what is currently being delivered then I have to ask the question, in
clear, open and honest communication..

 

Mr/s Customer how much more are you willing to pay so that we can invest
in more resources in order to develop a better product?

 

David Barker
VP Operations Declude
Your Email security is our business
978.499.2933 office
978.988.1311 fax
 mailto:dbar...@declude.com dbar...@declude.com

 

 

From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Darin
Cox
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 11:50 AM
To: declude.virus@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Declude Virus inoperable for 13% of th year?

 

Wow, what a way to respond to a long-time, loyal paying customer!  Instead
of apologizing for the serious problem and relaying what steps are being
taken to avoid it happening again (a simple reminder in the calendar system
of your choice would suffice), it's being thrown back in the customer's
face.

 

Regarding the question of increasing prices for service agreements, that has
no bearing on a current customer who has already paid the fees.  Such
customers should expect the service they paid for to be rendered.  Failure
to do so is a breach of agreement on Declude's part.  While we are all human
and problems can occur, this is a serious failure, and the tone of the
response being putative instead of apologetic makes customers less
forgiving, not more.

 

To be frank, many customers are asking what they are paying for, when fix
and feature requests take months to be released, or not at all.

 

I understand the situation may be frustrating, but it's often best to step
back for a moment, vent elsewhere if needed, then respond professionally to
customers.  Clear, open, and honest communication also helps.

 

Please don't take this email as incendiary.  It is meant to be constructive.

 

Darin.

 

 

- Original Message - 

From: David Barker mailto:dbar...@declude.com  

To: declude.virus@declude.com 

Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 11:07 AM

Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Declude Virus inoperable for 13% of th year?

 

Andy,

 

a.   Declude Virus does not have a built in system to report this error
as with this specific example. What happened here is not the norm but an
exception.  It was not our choice to hard code the expiration date but a
requirement from AVG. In this instance the specific persons who we had been
working with at AVG are no longer with the company and the process of having
this renewed took longer than usual. 

 

b.  I am not sure if you are being facetious, but if it makes you feel
better, sure you can schedule a reminder for me,  please email me at least 3
month prior of the new expiration date 2010-12-31 

 

c.   Yes AVG was not working as it should have been since 2009-04-10 I
agree with you -  this is totally unacceptable, intolerable, painful and

RE: [Declude.Virus] Declude Virus inoperable for 13% of th year?

2009-06-04 Thread Patrick Childers
Comments are in-line.
 


  _  

From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 10:03 AM
To: declude.virus@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Declude Virus inoperable for 13% of th year?



Sorry no marketing department to give you the warm and fuzzy spin, just me. 

 

Obviously. 

 

Couple of suggestions. Declude has the ability to run upto 5 additional cmd
line scanners of your choice, we provide AVG as a courtesy to our customers
as in the past Declude did not have any internal virus scanner, you would
have to go out and purchase that separately 

 

Well aware of that.

 

It would be good to run more than 1 virus scanner for several reasons, one
of which is failure of an AV scanner, (admittedly in this instance failure
was on our part) But rest assured false positives, no virus signatures, lag
time are problems ALL AV vendors are faced with. There are some that are
free that work extremely well ClamWin or ClamAV is an example of this.

 

In addition we have ZEROHOUR as a option for Perpetual license customers as
an additional  virus scanners providing ZEROHOUR protection and additional
spam definitions. For the amount of money that this is being offered for it
is a wise investment. If you opted out of this because you didn't want to
spend the extra few $ on security then you have different issues and it's
not Declude. 

 

LOL. I maybe one of the few, but I can spend almost whatever I need to to
protect my network. I do run multiple scanners as well as virus scanning on
the perimeter firewall.

 

If you didn't want to spend the extra few $ on making sure your code is
up-to-date then you have different issues and it's not your customers.

 

 Lastly Patrick please contact supp...@declude.com having looked at your
host record it does not look like you are receiving any AV updates - it
could be that your firewall is blocking the AV updates, our support can work
with you to fix that. 

 

LOL again. Don't need to. I don't use AVG. I only chimed in because I felt
that your responses to the issue was not helpful and somewhat offending the
users of your product.

 

Again, if you can't get the job done at current income levels, I suggest
you come up with the necessary figure after reviewing your operating costs.
You're the one selling a product. As for  you wanting to know what I will
pay for your product, I will leave you with this answer:  As much as I think
it is worth.

 

If the product is rock solid and I feel (or believe) that the company is
trying to stay up with current technologies and cares about me as a
customer,  I will pay much more than I would to a company that doesn't
project those qualities.

 

Oh, and by the way, I know how to setup a firewall. So, why don't you guys
concentrate on your code instead.

 

Thanks,

Patrick

 

 
Thanks
David 

 

 

From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Patrick
Childers
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 9:13 AM
To: declude.virus@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Declude Virus inoperable for 13% of th year?

 

How much are we willing to pay?

 

It doesn't matter if it costs $5 or $5000 if the product doesn't work.
Especially when you, the developer, doesn't notice the problem for a month
and a half - especially when the problem has been reported by end users. Do
you not run your own product?

 

Maybe you don't realize this, but your whining customers put a level of
trust in your company whether you want it or not. This trust  is
automatic when you are dealing with A/V products that protect mail systems
and their networks. If you lose that trust, the cost won't matter. You won't
have enough customers to stay in business anyway.

 

Price you product at whatever you think you need to. The mail admins will
either buy it or they won't.

 

Maybe it's time for you to find another person to communicate with the list.
You certainly aren't giving your end users that warm and fuzzy feeling.
(IMO)

 

Regards,

 

~Patrick

 

 

 

  _  

From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 12:14 PM
To: declude.virus@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Declude Virus inoperable for 13% of th year?

Darin,

 

I accept your constructive criticism. With regard to the situation;

 

1.   We recognize that this was a serious failure

2.   The issue was highlighted and resolved in the quickest possible
time

3.   Procedural steps have been put in place to ensure that this does
not happen again.

4.   This was an unfortunate circumstance and I understand the
frustration on the part of Declude customers

5.   We make every effort to meet the needs of our customers

 

My statement regarding increased prices has less to do with this current
problem as it has to do with moving forward and preventing issues like this
in the future. More $ means more resources which means more

RE: [Declude.Virus] Declude Virus inoperable for 13% of th year?

2009-06-04 Thread Patrick Childers
I run a business and I work for a business. Thank you. 
Maybe you should work for one...
 
~P

  _  

From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 1:17 PM
To: declude.virus@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Declude Virus inoperable for 13% of th year?



. but I can spend almost whatever I need to to protect my network.

 

There are those of us who run businesses and then there are those who work
for them. Either way your feedback is appreciated ;)

 

David

 

From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Patrick
Childers
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 12:50 PM
To: declude.virus@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Declude Virus inoperable for 13% of th year?

 

Comments are in-line.

 

 

  _  

From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 10:03 AM
To: declude.virus@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Declude Virus inoperable for 13% of th year?

Sorry no marketing department to give you the warm and fuzzy spin, just me. 

 

Obviously. 

 

Couple of suggestions. Declude has the ability to run upto 5 additional cmd
line scanners of your choice, we provide AVG as a courtesy to our customers
as in the past Declude did not have any internal virus scanner, you would
have to go out and purchase that separately 

 

Well aware of that.

 

It would be good to run more than 1 virus scanner for several reasons, one
of which is failure of an AV scanner, (admittedly in this instance failure
was on our part) But rest assured false positives, no virus signatures, lag
time are problems ALL AV vendors are faced with. There are some that are
free that work extremely well ClamWin or ClamAV is an example of this.

 

In addition we have ZEROHOUR as a option for Perpetual license customers as
an additional  virus scanners providing ZEROHOUR protection and additional
spam definitions. For the amount of money that this is being offered for it
is a wise investment. If you opted out of this because you didn't want to
spend the extra few $ on security then you have different issues and it's
not Declude. 

 

LOL. I maybe one of the few, but I can spend almost whatever I need to to
protect my network. I do run multiple scanners as well as virus scanning on
the perimeter firewall.

 

If you didn't want to spend the extra few $ on making sure your code is
up-to-date then you have different issues and it's not your customers.

 

 Lastly Patrick please contact supp...@declude.com having looked at your
host record it does not look like you are receiving any AV updates - it
could be that your firewall is blocking the AV updates, our support can work
with you to fix that. 

 

LOL again. Don't need to. I don't use AVG. I only chimed in because I felt
that your responses to the issue was not helpful and somewhat offending the
users of your product.

 

Again, if you can't get the job done at current income levels, I suggest
you come up with the necessary figure after reviewing your operating costs.
You're the one selling a product. As for  you wanting to know what I will
pay for your product, I will leave you with this answer:  As much as I think
it is worth.

 

If the product is rock solid and I feel (or believe) that the company is
trying to stay up with current technologies and cares about me as a
customer,  I will pay much more than I would to a company that doesn't
project those qualities.

 

Oh, and by the way, I know how to setup a firewall. So, why don't you guys
concentrate on your code instead.

 

Thanks,

Patrick

 


Thanks
David 

 

 

From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Patrick
Childers
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 9:13 AM
To: declude.virus@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Declude Virus inoperable for 13% of th year?

 

How much are we willing to pay?

 

It doesn't matter if it costs $5 or $5000 if the product doesn't work.
Especially when you, the developer, doesn't notice the problem for a month
and a half - especially when the problem has been reported by end users. Do
you not run your own product?

 

Maybe you don't realize this, but your whining customers put a level of
trust in your company whether you want it or not. This trust  is
automatic when you are dealing with A/V products that protect mail systems
and their networks. If you lose that trust, the cost won't matter. You won't
have enough customers to stay in business anyway.

 

Price you product at whatever you think you need to. The mail admins will
either buy it or they won't.

 

Maybe it's time for you to find another person to communicate with the list.
You certainly aren't giving your end users that warm and fuzzy feeling.
(IMO)

 

Regards,

 

~Patrick

 

 

 

  _  

From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 12:14 PM
To: declude.virus@declude.com

RE: [Declude.Virus] EXE in a Zip File

2005-06-03 Thread Patrick Childers
Title: Message



We block .exe's and zips containing exe's. Check out 
item #15 (Banning files based on 
extension) in the Declude Virus Manual at http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=117. 
You must be running the "Standard" or "Pro" version of Declude 
Virus.

HTH,
~Patrick

  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin 
  ShimwellSent: Friday, June 03, 2005 9:18 AMTo: 
  Declude.Virus@declude.comSubject: [Declude.Virus] EXE in a Zip 
  File
  
  Good 
  morning
  
  Im getting alot of 
  calls from yesterday on customers getting and attached zip. with and exe 
  file
  X-Virus-Scan-Result: Repaired 5542 [EMAIL PROTECTED].
  Subject: Your 
  Email Account is Suspended For Security Reasons
  WHat do I need to 
  do to stop this?
  I saw this once 
  time before.Im running declude virus with Fprot as the 
  scanner.
  


RE: [Declude.Virus] EXE in a Zip File

2005-06-03 Thread Patrick Childers
Title: Message



From the 4th paragraph of section 15 (of the link I 
posted):

"If you wish the banned file 
extensions to apply to files with .ZIP files, you can add a line "BANZIPEXTS ON" 
to your \{MAILSERVER}\Declude\virus.cfg file. For example, if you have a 
line "BANEXT EXE" and "BANZIPEXTS ON", then .EXE files within .ZIP files will be 
blocked. You can also use BANEZIPEXTS ON to do the same thing, but only applying 
to encrypted .ZIP files."

~Patrick

  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin 
  ShimwellSent: Friday, June 03, 2005 11:31 AMTo: 
  Declude.Virus@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.Virus] EXE in a Zip 
  File
  
  I 
  also block exe,
  But 
  how do you do that for exe contained in zips?
  
  
  Kevin ShimwellLink Brokers Group, 
  LLC ( Support )1600 Hwy 17 SouthNorth Myrtle Beach, SC 
  29582Phone: 843-663-1004Fax: 843-663-1007Email: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]24/7Help :http://www.linkbrokers.com/help_ticket.cfmSupport Forum:http://www.linkbrokers.com/chatboard/index.cfm?CFB=1Support M-F 1-888-546-5631 
  
  This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity 
  towhich it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, 
  confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of 
  this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent 
  responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are 
  hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this 
  communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
  in error, please notify us immediately by telephone and/or e-mail.
  

-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of Patrick ChildersSent: Friday, June 03, 2005 
11:07 AMTo: Declude.Virus@declude.comSubject: RE: 
[Declude.Virus] EXE in a Zip File
We block .exe's and zips containing exe's. Check 
out item #15 (Banning files 
based on extension) in the Declude Virus Manual at http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=117. 
You must be running the "Standard" or "Pro" version of Declude 
Virus.

HTH,
~Patrick

  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin 
  ShimwellSent: Friday, June 03, 2005 9:18 AMTo: 
  Declude.Virus@declude.comSubject: [Declude.Virus] EXE in a Zip 
  File
  
  Good 
  morning
  
  Im getting 
  alot of calls from yesterday on customers getting and attached zip. with 
  and exe file
  X-Virus-Scan-Result: Repaired 5542 [EMAIL PROTECTED].
  Subject: Your 
  Email Account is Suspended For Security Reasons
  WHat do I need 
  to do to stop this?
  I saw this 
  once time before.Im running declude virus with Fprot as the 
  scanner.
  


RE: [Declude.Virus] .EML file syntax

2005-06-01 Thread Patrick Childers
Title: Message



You could add a comma and then another address on the TO: 
line. This is what I do for my BANnotify message.


FROM: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TO: 
%ALLRECIP%, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SUBJECT: blah 
blah blah

HTH,
Patrick

  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran 
  JovanovicSent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 8:56 AMTo: 
  Declude.Virus@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.Virus] .EML file 
  syntax
  
  
  Yes this is what I 
  want
  
  FROM: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  TO: 
  %ALLRECIP%
  CC: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  SUBJECT: blah 
  blah blah
  
  I tried to add a CC: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] after the TO: 
  line but it does not work in 2.0.6.6
  
  This should be 
  something that Declude should be able to address. I will step away from asking 
  for a BC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] if it 
  is too difficult to create based on Andys comments below. But in my opinion 
  the BANNotify.EML file produces a brand new e-mail so there should not be, 
  IMO, any reason why the BCC functionality could not be 
  added.
  
  Declude: Is this on 
  the feature request list somewhere?
  
  
  
   
  Goran 
  Jovanovic
   
  The LAN 
  Shoppe
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  On Behalf Of William 
  StillwellSent: Wednesday, 
  June 01, 2005 8:22 AMTo: 
  Declude.Virus@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.Virus] .EML file 
  syntax
  
  
  I think your 
  confused, He wants the "Template" files to be CC'd to another 
  recip.
  
  
  
  ie, 
  now:
  
  
  
  FROM: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  TO: 
  %ALLRECIP%
  
  SUBJECT: blah 
  blah blah
  
  
  
  He wants to add 
  CC: , I have tried TO: %ALLRECIP%;[EMAIL PROTECTED] and that doesn't work 
  either, at least in 1.82.
  

- 
Original Message - 

From: Andy Schmidt 


To: Declude.Virus@declude.com 


Sent: Wednesday, 
June 01, 2005 12:21 AM

Subject: RE: 
[Declude.Virus] .EML file syntax



Hi Goran:



The "cc:" 
information is part of the (spoofable) SMTP header - the "bcc:" is not 
ANYWHERE. 



The only 
entitythat knows about the "bcc"s is the sending mail sever, it will 
simply distribute the message to anyone in the bcc and cc header. To each 
BCC or CC recipient's server it will look like a message that 
wasaddressed from one third party to another third party - they will 
not see the BCC information.



While the "cc:" 
(but not bcc) information can be found in the SMTP header in the receiving 
server (and thus Declude) there is no way to say whether that header is 
"true" or spoofed (although there is little motivation to spoof that header, 
that I can think of).



There simply is no 
way on earth for anythingbeyond the sending mail server to do anything 
with BCCs since the information simply is omitted and thus not available. 
Therefore, there is no reason to believe that it will (or could) ever be 
added to a future DEclude version.

Best 
RegardsAndy 
SchmidtPhone: +1 201 
934-3414 x20 (Business)Fax: +1 201 
934-9206 
-Original 
  Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  On Behalf Of Goran 
  JovanovicSent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 09:27 
  PMTo: Declude.Virus@declude.comSubject: [Declude.Virus] .EML file 
  syntax
  Hi,
  
  I know that in an 
  .EML file you can have a TO: %ALLRECIPS% (or whoever you want) but 
  can you also put in a CC or better yet a BCC? I have not found anything in 
  the 2.0.6 manual.
  
  
  Thanx
  
  
  
   Goran 
  Jovanovic
   
  The LAN 
  Shoppe


RE: [Declude.Virus] .EML file syntax

2005-06-01 Thread Patrick Childers
Title: Message



I agree...

~Patrick

  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran 
  JovanovicSent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 3:11 PMTo: 
  Declude.Virus@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.Virus] .EML file 
  syntax
  
  
  Yes that is what I 
  have resorted to but it would have been nice to be able to put it as a BCC so 
  that the recipients do not know that it is 
  monitored.
  
  Declude Support has 
  told me that this feature is now on the which 
  list.
  
  
  
   
  Goran 
  Jovanovic
   
  The LAN 
  Shoppe


RE: [Declude.Virus] Exploit-ObjectData trojan

2004-05-20 Thread Patrick Childers
Title: Message



http://us.mcafee.com/virusInfo/default.asp?id=descriptionvirus_k=100715

HTH,
~Patrick


RE: Re[3]: [Declude.Virus] Missed virus reports

2004-05-03 Thread Patrick Childers
Hello David,

 BANEZIPEXTS ON

Sorry to jump in but just a couple of thoughts.

Are you running the Pro version of Declude? I don't think BANEZIPEXTS
works on the Standard version. Secondly, I believe, in special
circumstances, some admins configure Declude Junkmail to run before
Declude AV. I think this configuration could cause this behavior.

~Patrick

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude/McAfee]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.Virus] W32/Netsky.c@MM - new

2004-02-25 Thread Patrick Childers
There's a new variant out.

http://vil.nai.com/vil/content/v_101048.htm

~Patrick

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude/McAfee]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.Virus] So Big E detection

2003-06-27 Thread Patrick Childers

 I have two scanners running, McAfee and F-Prot. On the McAfee 
 side, I believe I'm running the 4.2.60 engine and the 4273 
 DAT file, but I'm not at the shop where I can triple check. 
 F-Prot is catching these So-Big-E [name munged to protect the 
 guilty] viruses like a champion, but the McAfee side hasn't 
 detected a single one. Before I panic [panic requires a drive 
 in at midnight that I'm not up for tonight], have any other 
 McAfee users noticed anything dysfunctional about So Big E detection?
 

I use Mcafee with the 4.2.60 engine/4273 DAT, (was using 4.1.60
yesterday) and both engines were/are catching So Big E. I think you can
avoid the midnight drive and have a drink instead. :-)

~Patrick

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude/McAfee]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.Virus] Stopping bounce messages for MIME segment in MIME Preamble vulnerability

2002-11-15 Thread Patrick Childers
Good Morning All,
For the last couple of days, Declude has been catching many Outlook 'MIME
segment in MIME Preamble' Vulnerability messages. They have all been SPAM.
I don't want to send any bounce messages (for this vulnerability) to my
users.

Is this OK?
SKIPIFVIRUSNAMEHAS  Outlook 'MIME segment in MIME Preamble' Vulnerability

Would the blank spaces in the virus name cause a problem?

-Patrick

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude/McAfee]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



RE: [Declude.Virus] E-card email

2002-11-11 Thread Patrick Childers
John,
Please excuse my ignorance, but what does the backslash variable do to the
filter?
-Patrick

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:Declude.Virus-owner;declude.com]On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
 Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 12:54 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] E-card email


 I think you also need to include:

 f r i e n d g r e e t i n g s \ . c o m
 f r i e n d - g r e e t i n g s \ . c o m

 Again, without the spaces.

 John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
 IT Manager, Network Engineer
 RelianceSoft, Inc.
 Fullerton, CA  92835
 www.reliancesoft.com



 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
 (http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 ---
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude/McAfee]



---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude/McAfee]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



RE: [Declude.Virus] E-card email

2002-11-11 Thread Patrick Childers
 That is not a variable.
 
 Some of the messages had that as part of the address.
 
 Again, that is without the spaces. (Which are there in this posting so it
 does not get caught by everyone's filters and rules.)

Thank You John,
-Patrick
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude/McAfee]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



RE: [Declude.Virus] Braid virus

2002-11-08 Thread Patrick Childers
I have caught only two, and that was late yesterday. I am using McAfee. It
identified it as W32/Braid@MM

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:Declude.Virus-owner;declude.com]On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
 Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:51 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Braid virus


 I saw 4 on the Tuesday and none since.

 John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
 IT Manager, Network Engineer
 RelianceSoft, Inc.
 Fullerton, CA  92835
 www.reliancesoft.com


 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
 (http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 ---
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude/McAfee]



---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude/McAfee]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.