Re[2]: [Declude.Virus] how is Declude 3.x?

2005-11-24 Thread R. Lee Heath
You are not alone. We have sat on the same versions watching so many wrangle with upgrades to both over a lot of wasted time while our systems buzz right along in very reliable fashion. We reboot our setup about once every two months for no real reason because it appears these will

Re[2]: [Declude.Virus] PB installing 2.0B

2004-12-21 Thread R. Lee Heath
Ditto. -- Roger Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.rleeheath.com - Copy of Original Message(s): - CA Hey, Declude Support, I'm interested in a manual installation, too! CA ... --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from

[Declude.Virus] PIF Not Blocked With Whitelist

2004-07-14 Thread R. Lee Heath
I just had a user on my system send me a PIF file even though I have BANEXT PIF in my config? He authenticated on whitelist and the file went right through. This has got to be a bug, right? -- Roger Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.rleeheath.com --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses

Re[2]: [Declude.Virus] PIF Not Blocked With Whitelist

2004-07-14 Thread R. Lee Heath
Reply to: R. Scott Perry Re: [Declude.Virus] PIF Not Blocked With Whitelist on Wednesday 5:45:50 PM Was sent with web messaging and was infected with Netsky. Doesn't show up on the virus log. Here is header: Received: from rleeheath.com [24.154.165.94] by rleeheath.com with ESMTP

Re[4]: [Declude.Virus] Has McAfee fixed Virus Definition Corruptions Yet?

2004-06-18 Thread R. Lee Heath
http://www.sss.ca/sensible/home.nsf/docbyid/16DB651DF6279C1F85256EB7004AEF5F?OpenDocument McAfee has announced that the 4160 scan engine and earlier versions contained in McAfee Anti-virus products will cease to work correctly after applying the 4367 DAT files or later. The 4.1.60 scan

[Declude.Virus] MacAfee Error

2004-06-16 Thread R. Lee Heath
06/16/2004 16:25:59 Qbada003b03f8f42d Error -1 in virus scanner 2. All of a sudden I am getting this error in McAfee. I did not change anything. Any one know what this means? Thanks, -- Roger Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.rleeheath.com --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus

Re[3]: [Declude.Virus] Request for per-domain configuration

2004-03-31 Thread R. Lee Heath
Reply to: David Sullivan Re: [Declude.Virus] Request for per-domain configuration on Wednesday 1:30:38 PM Ditto. We are playing with our remote domain settings manager we have developed for use on our system with Declude. It is really a system for editing whitelist and blacklist in

[Declude.Virus] ClamAV settings? (no report.txt read)

2004-03-11 Thread R. Lee Heath
03/11/2004 05:26:18 Q4cc017210358707c Scanner 3: Virus= I-Worm/Netsky.C Attachment=transfer.zip [16] O 03/11/2004 05:26:19 Q4cc017210358707c Scanner #4 detected a virus 03/11/2004 05:26:19 Q4cc017210358707c File(s) are INFECTED [ W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]: 1] I am using Declude ClamAV recommended

[Declude.Virus] Banned Extensions at Bechtel

2004-01-28 Thread R. Lee Heath
Thought some here would find this interesting. This is the banned extensions at Bechtel.. the prominent information resource... and their responder message. File(s): document.scr Matching filename: *.scr Your attachment did not reach the intended recipient. To protect Bechtel's network