:)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eddie
Pang
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 8:44 PM
To: declude.virus@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.Virus] RE: Differences in reporting of ClamAV And ClamWin.
Hi All,
I am stumpted.
I am trying to run ClamAV to take
:)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eddie
Pang
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 8:44 PM
To: declude.virus@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.Virus] RE: Differences in reporting of ClamAV And ClamWin.
Hi All,
I am stumpted.
I am trying to run ClamAV to take
Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Also, for me to get the virus name I had to use the wrapper.
fyi - The names are otherwise recorded in the clamd.log
-Nick
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsu
d Log Parsers.
- Original Message -
From: "Eddie Pang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 2:43 AM
Subject: [Declude.Virus] RE: Differences in reporting of ClamAV And ClamWin.
Hi All,
I am stumpted.
I am trying to run ClamAV to take advantage of cl
Hi All,
I am stumpted.
I am trying to run ClamAV to take advantage of clamdscan.exe for speed and
performance, but I am unable to gather statistics for use with DLAnalyzer.
Looking closer at the logs, I find a slight variation between the 2
products. ClamWin reports the phish/virus on the sam
