Hi,
Below a log snippet where there was a vulnerability caught. However, in my
e-mail to the postmaster (myself) it is reported as an unkown virus in an
unknown file. How come? Is it because I'm also blocking PIF files?
I'm (still) using Declude 1.87i28 (will upgrade to the latest 1.79interim
Testing, please ignore...
begin:vcard
fn:Dan Star
n:Star;Dan
org:Engman-Taylor Co.
adr:;;W142 N9351 Fountain Blvd;Menomonee Falls;WI;53051;USA
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Manager of Market Analysis
tel;work:262-946-0322
tel;cell:262-853-9564
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
version:2.1
end:vcard
Sorry, Pong.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Dan Star
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 8:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.Virus] Test
Testing, please ignore...
Should Declude be catching a ByteVerify exploit?
This came through Declude/F-Prot/Trend::
NetShield-4.6.0: The file CACHE1:\ETC\PROXY\CACHE\1B\8FCC389B.AAJ\bb.class was
infected with
Exploit-ByteVerify . The file was successfully cleaned with Scan engine version 4.2.40
DAT version 4.0.4350.
Should Declude be catching a ByteVerify exploit?
This came through Declude/F-Prot/Trend::
NetShield-4.6.0: The file CACHE1:\ETC\PROXY\CACHE\1B\8FCC389B.AAJ\bb.class
was infected with
Exploit-ByteVerify . The file was successfully cleaned with Scan engine
version 4.2.40 DAT version 4.0.4350.
