On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 02:03:07AM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 11:09:34PM +0100, Mario Lorenz wrote:
Despite previous assertions to the contrary
(see eg. #118780), the no_proxy environment variable is not
always properly honored.
I believe mvo was looking into
Hello to all users and contributors from the zh8TW localisations in
Debian,
I hope I'm hitting the correct door for getting an answer.
If you look at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=218232
you'll find that the bug reporter mentions he finds the current
translation of Hit in APT
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.6
#The fix has been commited in my arch archive
http://www.perrier.eu.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 265720 pending
Bug#265720: apt [INTL:ja] update manpages
Tags were: l10n
Tags added:
Am 11. Jan 2005, um 12:54:57 schrieb Michael Vogt:
But I keep wondering why the putenv(no_proxy) call is there in the
first place?
I tested the behaviour of this attached patch with squid and it works
fine.
Its simply too late to make this call.
The problem is that direct ftp is handled
Good day:
I tried to call your 3 three time but your phone is not available. I think
you did a mistake during filling the form. Anyway, your mortgagge request
#9037 was appproved with 3.6, please reenter your info here
and we will start ASAP:
http://www.resfn.com/
Thank you
Jasper Anthony
5 matches
Mail list logo