Bug#283718: apt does not (always) honor the no_proxy environment variable

2005-01-11 Thread Michael Vogt
On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 02:03:07AM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote: On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 11:09:34PM +0100, Mario Lorenz wrote: Despite previous assertions to the contrary (see eg. #118780), the no_proxy environment variable is not always properly honored. I believe mvo was looking into

Bug#218232: APT translation to zh_TW

2005-01-11 Thread Christian Perrier
Hello to all users and contributors from the zh8TW localisations in Debian, I hope I'm hitting the correct door for getting an answer. If you look at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=218232 you'll find that the bug reporter mentions he finds the current translation of Hit in APT

Processed: tagging 265720

2005-01-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.6 #The fix has been commited in my arch archive http://www.perrier.eu.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] tags 265720 pending Bug#265720: apt [INTL:ja] update manpages Tags were: l10n Tags added:

Bug#283718: apt does not (always) honor the no_proxy environment variable

2005-01-11 Thread Mario Lorenz
Am 11. Jan 2005, um 12:54:57 schrieb Michael Vogt: But I keep wondering why the putenv(no_proxy) call is there in the first place? I tested the behaviour of this attached patch with squid and it works fine. Its simply too late to make this call. The problem is that direct ftp is handled

Re: offer, yet there was

2005-01-11 Thread Jasper Anthony
Good day: I tried to call your 3 three time but your phone is not available. I think you did a mistake during filling the form. Anyway, your mortgagge request #9037 was appproved with 3.6, please reenter your info here and we will start ASAP: http://www.resfn.com/ Thank you Jasper Anthony