Why can't you re-compile the DCLDB30.BPL as a Delphi 5 package?
Todd.
Hi All,
Unfortunately the answer is no.
Where can I go to get a professional version at a decent price?
TradeMe?
Must be almost a give-away by now.
Any ideas?
Thanks
Colin
- Original Message - From:
Leap into the 21st century. You can get a free turbo edition of Delphi 2006
from http://www.turboexplorer.com/
Regards
Sean
---
Sean Cross
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pics Print - The photo printing solution for Windows.
Hi Todd,
Simple answer. Because I don't have a clue how to.
Where can I look to find out, please.
Cheers
Colin
- Original Message -
From: Todd Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: NZ Borland Developers Group - Delphi List delphi@delphi.org.nz
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 7:22 PM
Subject:
Would not work anyway, as the IDE support is missing and the IDE does?
(did) have license checks based on packages.
So would be a waste of time.
You need to acquire a professional version of some later version.
Myles.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Sean,
Thanks for the suggestion but having looked on the site I can only see an
offering for Delphi 2007
which it seems will not allow me to install 3rd party packages three of which
which I rely on to make the product useful.
I'm being cynical but it seems I'd also have to purchase
This is an odd one but I have had the problem demonstrated to me today as I
found it hard to believe.
I'm using BDS 2006, Delphi personality plus the TMS component set. The
application uses a mathematical model to simulate heat transfer and does
millions of calculations solving differential
A further point of interest is that a tester, in a different
organisation, reports the same issue i.e. it doesn't produce the
correct answers as a network user but does on a standalone pc. In this
case the standalone pc is a physically different machine.
I'm struggling to come up with any
I'm trying to think of a way other running processes could affect the
numerical calculations in the way described.
I've been around long enough to remember the Pentium FDIV bug which is what
this reminds me of, except that of course it does produce the right answers
on the same machine as a
I'm trying to think of a way other running processes could affect the
numerical calculations in the way described.
Whereas all the other possible causes are obvious, right? g
First rule of troubleshooting - isolate potential causes where
possible, even if a mechanism isn't that clear. We're
