GetActiveWindow re-enters the message queue so I'm guessing that has
something to do with it.
Cheers,
Karl
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:35 AM, ja...@software-solutions.co.nz
ja...@software-solutions.co.nz wrote:
Hi there,
I have been experiencing a Stack Overflow error in my WndProc override
Max := Bias.Position * Trunc(Log10(Math.Max(10, High(Files) * 10 div 3)));
That was my point, the original describes exactly what was intended. One
liners generally don't and tend to introduce errors
The etc kind of throws a spanner in the works. But yes, the
following is slightly more
I would make an appearance if it was there.
Cheers,
Karl
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 9:45 AM, lbisman lbis...@clear.net.nz wrote:
Is anyone interested in resurrecting the ChCh DUG ? - after
the recent launch it didn't seem like there were many
interested parties.
We used to host it at the
Could try using ImageList_DrawEx explicitly?
Image1.Height := ImageList1.Height;
Image1.Width := ImageList1.Width;
ImageList_DrawEx(ImageList1.Handle, ImageIndex,
Image1.Canvas.Handle, 0, 0, 0, 0, CLR_NONE, CLR_NONE, 0);
Cheers,
Karl
___
NZ
One way to get around this would be to add your own descendant of
TListBox and add an Objects property that works as you would expect
(ie. use that instead of items.objects). Here's a quick sample I
knocked together:
unit MyListBox;
interface
uses
SysUtils, Classes, Controls, StdCtrls,
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Jolyon Smith jsm...@deltics.co.nz wrote:
function ListBoxGetObject(const aListBox: TListBox; const aIndex: Integer):
TObject;
begin
if (aIndex 0) or (aIndex = aListBox.Items.Count) then
TStringsHelper(aListBox.Items).Error(SListIndexError, aIndex);
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Alister Christie
alis...@salespartner.co.nz wrote:
I think the point I was trying to make is that it is that the method
(/array indexer or whatever) was expecting a TObject - passing anything
else could result in unexpected results.
Only if you stipulate that
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Kyley Harris ky...@harrissoftware.com wrote:
interesting
if Longint(Result) = LB_ERR then Error(SListIndexError, Index);
it would seem that the error is not in delphi at all. Well.. they are simply
raising the Windows error which say that -1 is the error
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Jolyon Smith jsm...@deltics.co.nz wrote:
Win API returns -1 to indicate “an error”. Any error. Not a specific
error. Certainly not specifically a list index error.
Pardon me for being pedantic, but while I agree with everything else
you said, I feel the need
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Jolyon Smith jsm...@deltics.co.nz wrote:
Good luck with GetLastError(). There's nothing to indicate that
LB_GETITEMDATA processing will set a Windows LastError.
And empirically I would have to say that it doesn't:
Hmm... empirically I would have to say it
r := SendMessage(Listbox1.Handle, LB_GETITEMDATA, 100, 0);
if GetLastError 0 then
RaiseLastOSError;
if r = -1 then
ShowMessage('oops');
Will yield only the oops message, no OS error.
Tested this code too. I get a system error, invalid index.
How odd.
Cheers,
Karl
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Jolyon Smith jsm...@deltics.co.nz wrote:
D2006, and *I* get 0, -1, -1... no error
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Jolyon Smith jsm...@deltics.co.nz wrote:
But since we're talking about behavior in the OS not the VCL or compiler,
more pertinent perhaps is the
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Kyley Harris ky...@harrissoftware.com wrote:
I'll add my cents..
under Delphi 7, getlasterror returns error 1413 as Karl said.. under Delphi
2007 no errors whatsoever. whats clear is that Getlasterror is unlreliable
in this situation as Microsoft says, because
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Kyley Harris ky...@harrissoftware.com wrote:
the fact that it behaves different under delphi 7 and Delphi 2007 on the
same machine implies that there is some strange mystery at work in the
compiled code that is not obvious. its not a direct problem of the
/b-delphi-b-programmer-chocolate-fish-software/christchurch/16693700/82/1/
Email me if you're interested.
Cheers,
Karl Reynolds
Director, Chocolate Fish Software Limited
(03) 374 2581
___
NZ Borland Developers Group - Delphi mailing list
Post: delphi
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 3:18 PM, David O'Brien d...@iccs.co.nz wrote:
Do you require employee's to be on-site? Or can we work remotely?
On site. I know, I know...
Cheers,
Karl Reynolds
Director, Chocolate Fish Software Limited
(03) 374 2581
___
NZ
1. Still maintaining Delphi code?
Yes. Over 200 police departments across 32 US states use our software.
2. Started a new Delphi project in the last year?
Well it's mostly ongoing development in the same system, but yes, we
are constantly adding more modules.
3. Started a new project in
Use GlobalMemoryStatusEx
(http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa366781(VS.85).aspx)
Cheers,
Carl
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:39 PM, Vikas... [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am creating a window service using delphi 5. I need some help is getting
the CPU memory usage of the machine so that
(Here we go with another optimistic post... maybe this one will make
it to the list! Maybe)
IMHO as soon as FB branched from IB6 it was really wishful thinking to
expect that the IB driver (and it was always IB only) would always
work with FB. In our case we were kind of forced into Firebird as
It shouldn't be that slow. A quick test here of loading a CDS with 15K
records finished in under half a second. Maybe you have some
badly-behaved components around that don't properly respect your
DisableControls/EnableControls? See if disconnecting your dataset from
all datasources before loading
It isn't different, but that's because:
List := TStringList.Create;
PopulateList(List);
try
if List.Count 0 then
begin
.do lots of stuff with the list
End;
Finally
List.Free;
End;
is not safe. You need to move the PopulateList(List) inside the try/finally,
and
Tracey Maule wrote:
a shame you werent there yesterday before i set that field by hand.
Sorry, I'm still in the US at the moment, and since I don't check the DUG
every day I'm usually a little late with my replies. I didn't mean what I
said to be quite as testy as it came out - I was just
Of course you can do this in Interbase. OTTOMH (I'm not at work right now):
update TABLE1 t1
set updatefield = ((
select t3.updatefield
from TABLE2 t2, TABLE3 t3
Where t1.idfield = t2.idfield
and t2.anotheridfield = t3.anotheridfield))
And you can add where t1 condition on the bottom if
Max wrote:
In certian situation you may not want IFirstDescendant to be available
if ISecondDescendant is available, and so Delphi's behaviour is
actually to your benefit as it allow comlpete control over exactly
what interfaces an object makes available to QueryInterface. It is
always better
So this is one simple case where you have IStream inheriting
from ISequentialStream (see ActiveX.pas) but you are not required
to implement ISequentialStream is you are implementing IStream.
Utterly bizarre. I get your point - that interface inheritance has to be
implemented the way it is in
25 matches
Mail list logo
