Re: [DUG]: Report Builder Pro (was Delphi and Crystal on NT4)

1999-03-15 Thread Mark Derricutt

Hmm - time to answer my own postings :)

Mark Derricutt wrote:

  This is a worry. Some add on third party things don't keep up with the
  play. Mark didn't you say earlier you couldn't get this to install?

In this case it was I that didn't keep up with the play and installing
the latest release of RBPro :)

Mark
---
New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz



Re: [DUG]: Report Builder Pro (was Delphi and Crystal on NT4)

1999-03-15 Thread pjones



For what it's worth, I have just evaluated (mostly) Seagate Info 7.  In the
process I had a look at Report Builder Pro.

Info includes Seagate Report Designer (formelly Crystal Reports) as well as
many other designers.  The only comparison that can be made between RB Pro
(or non pro) is in the designer and vcl components.  For designer, SRD wins
easily - allthough it has some annoying 'features' and is not allways
exactly wysiwyg.  RP Pro wins in the VCL department but then it has really
cause without it's vcl it would not work.  Feature wise, they are fairly
even.

My conclusions are prettry straight forward - use RB Pro if your a
programmer and want light weight reports and like lots of coding.  Use Info
or just Seagate Reports if you are more user orientated and want
performance and scalability.  (Info provides server based reporting with
too many features to mention here).

All the people here who say that Crystal is slow have obviously not done
any serious C/S work because all crystal does is run a query.  If you write
lousy queries then it doesn't matter what tool you use - performance will
be bad.  Since Crystal 5 (maybe earlier) you have been able to use stored
procedures or user entered queries.


---
New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz



RE: [DUG]: Report Builder Pro (was Delphi and Crystal on NT4)

1999-03-14 Thread Belding

Russell wrote

This reply is from a pragmatic Crystal Reports user not from someone who
knows Crystal internals well. I'm using the Crystal Reports Print Engine 16
from a D1 application and some reports requiring a date range or name of
person it brings back all records to the client pc for filtering. If there
is a smarter way to use the CRPE I'd would welcome insight. 

There are many areas to evaluate something like CR. Examples: prior
investment, cost of changing, export ability, ease of installation (my
problem at present using it on NT4 boxes), ability to subreport, and others.

For example, CR's exporting ability suits my requirements well. Reports can
be exported to Excel, HTML, Lotus, RTF, Word files (mostly), into exchange
folders and more. (I'm mixing CR32 and CR16 capabilities here)



Tony wrote
[]  I appreciate your comments Russell. (Not sure I understand your first
para too well. I think you are agreeing with us???)

I am happy with QR (Despite all the bugs) but Customers KEEP on wanting
stuff done in Crystal thanks to the MS marketing lies. I'd like to have a
nice simple report builder to hand on to my customers instead of Crystal,
but there does not appear to be much out there. As Steve points out, if
your DB is anything larger than small (say 50MB) then Crystal is useless.
No chance of geting them to change their thinking I suppose? IMO it is
essential to be able to build the report around your own SQL.

I don't consider your last Para a good reason. All of these can be done
easily using QR or writing your own Delphi Components anyway.

Of course there is allways Report Smith!!!


Russell Replies:

In my first para I was thinking how nice it would be to speed up one report
I have in CR which takes too long because CR brings all records back to the
client for filtering. I could move up to Crystal Info, but that adds cost
to Winlaw and achieves only a five min saving per day for my clients. I
could also do filtering using the bde before invoking CR on a temporary
table. This then makes my report a one user at a time report - which is OK
in this case. Someone  earlier said CR7 does server side filtering. I'm
still on CR5. The table record counts Winlaw deals with now are manageable.

Based on the good words spoken here about Report Builder Pro I looked at
the RBPro site 
www.digital-metaphors.com
and liked what I saw.

Exporting reports is not as simple as you indicate. I'm thinking about
exporting reports to MSWord.  CR can export to RTF faily well but it cannot
export correctly to MS Word preserving all the formatting, for documents
whose complexity is beyond that of RTF documents, but within Word 97 scope.
Perhaps CR 6 and 7 have been improved; the CR tech team once told me
something like "exporting 100% correctly to Word is in our too hard basket".


Regarding my problem with CR5.0.1.108 (16bit) on NT4. I have almost
concluded this verion of CR will not run under NT4. It installs on NT4 but
will not run. The 32 bit version will run on NT4 (at least I can export a
report and the exported package will run on NT). I'm waiting for comments
from the CR tech support team, when they return tomorrow. From this team
I've received one or two replies per working day. 

So I'm preparing to shift my 16 bit apps report package into a D4 program
and this will mean having two bde's installed on each clients server. One
for the app and one for its reporting package. 


Regards


Russell Belding
Belding Computing Devices
WINLAW, BIZXWORD, ENGPER.

---
New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz



RE: [DUG]: Report Builder Pro (was Delphi and Crystal on NT4)

1999-03-14 Thread Paul Ritchie

Someone  earlier said CR7 does server side filtering. 
The manual says this is new to CR7.

CR can export to RTF faily well but it cannot
export correctly to MS Word preserving all the formatting...
Is that generally a requirement of report writers?

if your DB is anything larger than small (say 50MB) then
Crystal is useless.
We are using CR6 on Access (900 MB) and MS SQL Server 6.5
databases up to 1.2Gb with no problems.


Paul Ritchie
RCS (NZ) Ltd.


---
New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz



RE: [DUG]: Report Builder Pro (was Delphi and Crystal on NT4)

1999-03-14 Thread Belding

At 13:36 15/03/99 +1300, you wrote:
   Someone  earlier said CR7 does server side filtering. 
   The manual says this is new to CR7.

   CR can export to RTF faily well but it cannot
   export correctly to MS Word preserving all the formatting...

   Is that generally a requirement of report writers?


No it is not. It is a bonus. The "export to Word" task is v difficult. My
apology to the CR people if I implied it was a defect in their product!

Russell B.

Russell Belding
Belding Computing Devices
WINLAW, BIZXWORD, ENGPER.

---
New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz



Re: [DUG]: Report Builder Pro (was Delphi and Crystal on NT4)

1999-03-14 Thread Mark Derricutt

Tony wrote:

 nice simple report builder to hand on to my customers instead of Crystal,
 but there does not appear to be much out there. As Steve points out, if

Report Builder Pro provides a very nice royalty free end-user report
designer.  Report formats can be stored in BLOB fields inside a database
which is very handy, or also saved to disk.  The report designer has
-full- query-by-example editors so that you're clients to get to your
data in any format they want.  And you can also limit what they can see
(i.e. hide table names and give them end-user descriptions making things
very nice :)

Russell wrote:

 www.digital-metaphors.com and liked what I saw.

On the downside, Report Builder Pro is quite sore on the wallet, about
NZ$500 from memory, but imho worth it.
 
 Exporting reports is not as simple as you indicate. I'm thinking about
 exporting reports to MSWord.  CR can export to RTF faily well but it cannot
 export correctly to MS Word preserving all the formatting, for documents
 whose complexity is beyond that of RTF documents, but within Word 97 scope.
 Perhaps CR 6 and 7 have been improved; the CR tech team once told me
 something like "exporting 100% correctly to Word is in our too hard basket".

For exporting to RTF/XLS/HTML with Report Builder, check out
http://www.waler.com.  A simple third-party "output device".
 
 So I'm preparing to shift my 16 bit apps report package into a D4 program
 and this will mean having two bde's installed on each clients server. One
 for the app and one for its reporting package.

Eeek :( Not very elegant, but needs must I guess.
---
New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz



Re: [DUG]: Report Builder Pro (was Delphi and Crystal on NT4)

1999-03-14 Thread Tony Blomfield

Fair enough...


So I'm preparing to shift my 16 bit apps report package into a D4 program
and this will mean having two bde's installed on each clients server. One
for the app and one for its reporting package.


Regards


Russell Belding
Belding Computing Devices
WINLAW, BIZXWORD, ENGPER.

---
New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz

---
New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz



Re: [DUG]: Report Builder Pro (was Delphi and Crystal on NT4)

1999-03-14 Thread Belding

At 13:46 15/03/99 +1300, you wrote:
Report Builder Pro provides a very nice royalty free end-user report
designer.  Report formats can be stored in BLOB fields inside a database
which is very handy, or also saved to disk.  The report designer has
-full- query-by-example editors so that you're clients to get to your
data in any format they want.  And you can also limit what they can see
(i.e. hide table names and give them end-user descriptions making things
very nice :)


That would be nice for some clients.

Russell wrote:

 www.digital-metaphors.com and liked what I saw.

On the downside, Report Builder Pro is quite sore on the wallet, about
NZ$500 from memory, but imho worth it.
 

The current price of RBPro is US$495 with source. See their WWW site.



 Exporting reports is not as simple as you indicate. I'm thinking about
 exporting reports to MSWord.  CR can export to RTF faily well but it cannot
 export correctly to MS Word preserving all the formatting, for documents
 whose complexity is beyond that of RTF documents, but within Word 97 scope.
 Perhaps CR 6 and 7 have been improved; the CR tech team once told me
 something like "exporting 100% correctly to Word is in our too hard
basket".

For exporting to RTF/XLS/HTML with Report Builder, check out
http://www.waler.com.  A simple third-party "output device".
 

This is a worry. Some add on third party things don't keep up with the
play. Mark didn't you say earlier you couldn't get this to install?


 So I'm preparing to shift my 16 bit apps report package into a D4 program
 and this will mean having two bde's installed on each clients server. One
 for the app and one for its reporting package.

Eeek :( Not very elegant, but needs must I guess.

There is a time to be pragmatic and a time to be elegant.
"Everything should be as simple as possible but not simpler." A.E.


Russell B.
Russell Belding
Belding Computing Devices
WINLAW, BIZXWORD, ENGPER.

---
New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz



Re: [DUG]: Report Builder Pro (was Delphi and Crystal on NT4)

1999-03-14 Thread Belding

 We are using CR6 on Access (900 MB) and MS SQL Server 6.5
databases up to 1.2Gb with no problems.


So can you please let us in on the secret, How do you get a report to run in
a reasonable time where you have a join involving say 8 tables (not an
unreasonable number) accross a 900MB DB, where any one of those table has
lets say 1 million rows, and Crystal returns T1 X T2 X T3..X T8 Rows in
the result set.

I'd really like to know how you do this.

I'd also like to know how you manage to stuff 900MB into access tables with
reliability, but thats another issue. Ah to hell with it, it's not worth the
argument.


It may not be worth an argument but it is, I think, worth discussing.

It would seem using CR6 with MS SQL 6.5 there is server side filtering, not
client side filtering.

From Paul's description we don't know if the Access table has many records
or large objects per record. Or the average peak number of concurrent users
per week.

Regards
Russell Belding
Belding Computing Devices
WINLAW, BIZXWORD, ENGPER.

---
New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz



Re: [DUG]: Report Builder Pro (was Delphi and Crystal on NT4)

1999-03-14 Thread Mark Derricutt

Belding wrote:

 This is a worry. Some add on third party things don't keep up with the
 play. Mark didn't you say earlier you couldn't get this to install?

I got another email from James this morning, the current version of his
TExtraDevices is for RB4.05 (i'm still using 4.03) so I've just
downloaded the new RB.  Seems I got suck either side of the upgrades :) 
Hopefully I should get RB4.05 installed tomorrow and I'll report back.
 
 There is a time to be pragmatic and a time to be elegant.
 "Everything should be as simple as possible but not simpler." A.E.

Very good quote there :)
---
New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz



RE: [DUG]: Report Builder Pro (was Delphi and Crystal on NT4)

1999-03-13 Thread Tony Blomfield


At 22:45 12/03/99 +1300, Tony wrote:

The question I asked on my last mail was directed to the chap, who obviously
new Crystal very well, but unfortunatly I haven't had a reply. To refresh
your memory, the question was "Does Crystal still create real dumb SQL which
can not be modified and which brings all columns back to the workstation
where they are filterd locally???" Take a slow boat to china...


This reply is from a pragmatic Crystal Reports user not from someone who
knows Crystal internals well. I'm using the Crystal Reports Print Engine 16
from a D1 application and some reports requiring a date range or name of
person it brings back all records to the client pc for filtering. If there
is a smarter way to use the CRPE I'd would welcome insight. 

There are many areas to evaluate something like CR. Examples: prior
investment, cost of changing, export ability, ease of installation (my
problem at present using it on NT4 boxes), ability to subreport, and others.

For example, CR's exporting ability suits my requirements well. Reports can
be exported to Excel, HTML, Lotus, RTF, Word files (mostly), into exchange
folders and more. (I'm mixing CR32 and CR16 capabilities here)


[]  I appreciate your comments Russell. (Not sure I understand your first para too 
well. I think you are agreeing with us???)

I am happy with QR (Despite all the bugs) but Customers KEEP on wanting stuff done in 
Crystal thanks to the MS marketing lies. I'd like to have a nice simple report builder 
to hand on to my customers instead of Crystal, but there does not appear to be much 
out there. As Steve points out, if your DB is anything larger than small (say 50MB) 
then Crystal is useless. No chance of geting them to change their thinking I suppose? 
IMO it is essential to be able to build the report around your own SQL.

I don't consider your last Para a good reason. All of these can be done easily using 
QR or writing your own Delphi Components anyway.

Of course there is allways Report Smith!!!

Cheers, 
 
Regards


Russell Belding
Belding Computing Devices
WINLAW, BIZXWORD, ENGPER.

---
New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz
 application/ms-tnef


Re: [DUG]: Report Builder Pro (was Delphi and Crystal on NT4)

1999-03-12 Thread Tony Blomfield


-Original Message-
From: Mark Derricutt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list delphi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Friday, 12 March 1999 10:27
Subject: [DUG]: Report Builder Pro (was Delphi and Crystal on NT4)


Tony Blomfield wrote:

 In addition, IMO quick reports is very much simpler to use. Now we have
 Report Builder Pro, and that is a superb product. It is hard to imagine
how
 Crystal could compete with RB Pro.

*yay* another RBPro developer :)  I've been using RBPro for a while now
and find it to be one of the best reporting tools available, especially
for customizability, the authors are always active on their news server
at news.digital-metaphors.com and answer most questions within 1-2 days,
a week at most.

I find the ability to create your own report objects/components VERY
nice, even though I havn't yet used it.

Tony - Have you tried the TExtraDevices add-on?  Which provides
reporting to rtf/xls/html??  I'm having problems getting it installed
into D3 :(


Hi Mark,

The answer is No. I am just making the transition from QR to RBPro, so I am
a novice, but what I see, I like a lot. It's slick.

The question I asked on my last mail was directed to the chap, who obviously
new Crystal very well, but unfortunatly I haven't had a reply. To refresh
your memory, the question was "Does Crystal still create real dumb SQL which
can not be modified and which brings all columns back to the workstation
where they are filterd locally???" Take a slow boat to china...

C-Ya,

Tony.
Mark
---
New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz

---
New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz



Re: [DUG]: Report Builder Pro (was Delphi and Crystal on NT4)

1999-03-12 Thread Steve Peacocke

At 10:45 pm 12/3/1999 +1300, Tony Blomfield said:
The question I asked on my last mail was directed to the chap, who obviously
new Crystal very well, but unfortunatly I haven't had a reply. To refresh
your memory, the question was "Does Crystal still create real dumb SQL which
can not be modified and which brings all columns back to the workstation
where they are filterd locally???" Take a slow boat to china...

Gidday Tony,

The answer is definately half right to that one. It's a problem I hit a
while back where Crystal does not generate certain SQL calls, e.g. "NULL",
but filters those cals at the workstation.

This causes problems when you e.g. ask for all records where the "name is
NOT NULL". Crystal will select all records in this case to send to the
workstation where the workstation will print only those with a blank name
(maybe none).

To get around this fault, you can edit the generated SQL directly -
PROBLEM: You will have to remember to keep editing the SQL every time you
open that report in Crystal as it re-generates the SQL every time.

Hope this helps.

I've been using QR but will have a looky at this RBPro due to the kind
words and warm fuzzies experienced by others here.

Steve
 __
|Steve Peacocke  ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 
| www.trader.co.nz/
| www.trader.co.nz/vizsla/
---
New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz



Re: [DUG]: Report Builder Pro (was Delphi and Crystal on NT4)

1999-03-12 Thread Mark Derricutt

Steve Peacocke wrote:

 I've been using QR but will have a looky at this RBPro due to the kind
 words and warm fuzzies experienced by others here.

Steve, don't forget to check out the news.digatal-metaphors.com usenet
server, just reading through should be very informative for you as well.

Mark
---
New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz



Re: [DUG]: Report Builder Pro (was Delphi and Crystal on NT4)

1999-03-12 Thread Belding

At 22:45 12/03/99 +1300, Tony wrote:

The question I asked on my last mail was directed to the chap, who obviously
new Crystal very well, but unfortunatly I haven't had a reply. To refresh
your memory, the question was "Does Crystal still create real dumb SQL which
can not be modified and which brings all columns back to the workstation
where they are filterd locally???" Take a slow boat to china...


This reply is from a pragmatic Crystal Reports user not from someone who
knows Crystal internals well. I'm using the Crystal Reports Print Engine 16
from a D1 application and some reports requiring a date range or name of
person it brings back all records to the client pc for filtering. If there
is a smarter way to use the CRPE I'd would welcome insight. 

There are many areas to evaluate something like CR. Examples: prior
investment, cost of changing, export ability, ease of installation (my
problem at present using it on NT4 boxes), ability to subreport, and others.

For example, CR's exporting ability suits my requirements well. Reports can
be exported to Excel, HTML, Lotus, RTF, Word files (mostly), into exchange
folders and more. (I'm mixing CR32 and CR16 capabilities here)

Regards


Russell Belding
Belding Computing Devices
WINLAW, BIZXWORD, ENGPER.

---
New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz