On Wed, 2021-11-03 at 17:33 +, Richard Shann wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-11-03 at 14:35 +, Richard Shann wrote:
> > Thanks for the feedback.
> > On Wed, 2021-11-03 at 15:20 +0200, Lib Lists wrote:
> > > Hi, everything seems to work here well and smoothly. The
> > > automatic
> > > adjustment
On Wed, 2021-11-03 at 14:35 +, Richard Shann wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback.
> On Wed, 2021-11-03 at 15:20 +0200, Lib Lists wrote:
> > Hi, everything seems to work here well and smoothly. The automatic
> > adjustment creates quite a big gap between staves, making reading
> > multiple staves
Thanks for the feedback.
On Wed, 2021-11-03 at 15:20 +0200, Lib Lists wrote:
> Hi, everything seems to work here well and smoothly. The automatic
> adjustment creates quite a big gap between staves, making reading
> multiple staves slightly uncomfortable to me. Is that done on purpose
> (for
On Tue, 2 Nov 2021 at 17:15, Richard Shann wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2021-11-02 at 16:58 +0200, Lib Lists wrote:
> > Hi and thank you as always!
> > Comments below.
> >
> > On Mon, 1 Nov 2021 at 19:40, Richard Shann
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2021-11-01 at 18:01 +0200, Lib Lists wrote:
> > > > Hi,
Hi, everything seems to work here well and smoothly. The automatic
adjustment creates quite a big gap between staves, making reading
multiple staves slightly uncomfortable to me. Is that done on purpose
(for example in the future the possibility of giving more space to
other elements, i.e.
Update of bug #60898 (project denemo):
Status:None => Fixed
Open/Closed:Open => Closed
___
Follow-up Comment #1:
A line of text