On Wed, 2021-11-03 at 17:33 +, Richard Shann wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-11-03 at 14:35 +, Richard Shann wrote:
> > Thanks for the feedback.
> > On Wed, 2021-11-03 at 15:20 +0200, Lib Lists wrote:
> > > Hi, everything seems to work here well and smoothly. The
> > > automatic
> > > adjustment
On Wed, 2021-11-03 at 14:35 +, Richard Shann wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback.
> On Wed, 2021-11-03 at 15:20 +0200, Lib Lists wrote:
> > Hi, everything seems to work here well and smoothly. The automatic
> > adjustment creates quite a big gap between staves, making reading
> > multiple staves
Thanks for the feedback.
On Wed, 2021-11-03 at 15:20 +0200, Lib Lists wrote:
> Hi, everything seems to work here well and smoothly. The automatic
> adjustment creates quite a big gap between staves, making reading
> multiple staves slightly uncomfortable to me. Is that done on purpose
> (for
Hi, everything seems to work here well and smoothly. The automatic
adjustment creates quite a big gap between staves, making reading
multiple staves slightly uncomfortable to me. Is that done on purpose
(for example in the future the possibility of giving more space to
other elements, i.e.
I've overhauled the code controlling how much space is allowed for
staffs in the display. Except for the space above the top staff (which
can be controlled as before with the mouse wheel or by setting it in
the staff properties) the space allowed is now computed while the
staffs are drawn.
This is
