On 14.07.2004, at 19:57, Mark R. Diggory wrote:
But then this becomes a project spanning both the Repository group and
the various clients out there Depot/Maven/etc. And agreement on the
GEO_IP request protocol and xml format etc becomes a touchy subject
don't they?
Maybe but as I understood
- Original Message -
From: Mark R. Diggory [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 8:48 AM
Subject: ASF Repository, closer.cgi and Depot
Sorry for the cross post but this seems relevant to both these groups.
I was thinking about
Erik Abele wrote:
I suspect their views would include what you suggest, that
distribution might
save some nomimal (c.f. artifact sizes) bandwidth savings give some
CPU
saving, but it'd be at significant loss of 'control' (of well behaved
clients). Central control over this seems the most
