Re: Test Harness useprocess=false question

John Embretsen wrote: Myrna van Lunteren wrote: John, I found that indeed, using mainMethod.invoke(null,arguments) was required and worked well. Thx. I'm glad to hear that! I noticed that you included this code change in your (rather large) patch for DERBY-413. One consequence of this

Re: Test Harness useprocess=false question

Daniel John Debrunner wrote: John Embretsen wrote: Myrna van Lunteren wrote: I'm wondering if this wouldn't be a nice thing to have after all...? A washwombat() method? Absolutely, I was wondering whether such a method existed somewhere already myself, until I saw the e-

Re: Test Harness useprocess=false question

John Embretsen wrote: > Myrna van Lunteren wrote: >> I'm wondering if this wouldn't be a nice thing to have after all...? A >> washwombat() method? > > > Absolutely, I was wondering whether such a method existed somewhere > already myself, until I saw the e-mail you referred to. > >> I'm imag

Re: Test Harness useprocess=false question

Myrna van Lunteren wrote: John, I found that indeed, using mainMethod.invoke(null,arguments) was required and worked well. Thx. I'm glad to hear that! I noticed that you included this code change in your (rather large) patch for DERBY-413. One consequence of this code change is that the

Re: Test Harness useprocess=false question

John,   I found that indeed, using mainMethod.invoke(null,arguments) was required and worked well. Thx.   I did modify a few tests classes to be public rather than have the default package protection in addition, for the above approach did not get around that limitation. I did not investigate all t

Re: Test Harness useprocess=false question

Friday, November 18, 2005, 8:31:28 PM, Myrna van Lunteren wrote: >> On 11/18/05, John Embretsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Are there other cases (other than the nist tests) where we should be >> able to run with useprocess set to false? > > > To be frank, a former Cloudscape QA had at one po

Re: Test Harness useprocess=false question

On 11/18/05, John Embretsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Myrna van Lunteren wrote:> On 11/17/05, *Daniel John Debrunner* < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:>> The test harness can run tests within the same jvm if useprocess=false.> This is set for the nist suite, so that all the s

Re: Test Harness useprocess=false question

Myrna van Lunteren wrote: On 11/17/05, *Daniel John Debrunner* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: The test harness can run tests within the same jvm if useprocess=false. This is set for the nist suite, so that all the sub-scripts are run in a single JVM, mainl

Re: Test Harness useprocess=false question

On 11/17/05, Daniel John Debrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: The test harness can run tests within the same jvm if useprocess=false.This is set for the nist suite, so that all the sub-scripts are run in a single JVM, mainly for performance reasons.I'm looking at the code in RunTest.java so I ca

Test Harness useprocess=false question

The test harness can run tests within the same jvm if useprocess=false. This is set for the nist suite, so that all the sub-scripts are run in a single JVM, mainly for performance reasons. I'm looking at the code in RunTest.java so I can add security manager to this in-process mode. The buildTest