calling a function over odbc fails

2006-12-07 Thread Marco Schilling
Hello everyone, I wrote a function called CHKANI(ani varchar(50)) and it works pretty fine in ij. Now I try to use it with the DB2 ODBC-Driver and it fails with ... is not recognized as a function or procedure. The statement looks like this: SELECT CHKANI('0123456') AS ANI, PHONE from

Re: calling a function over odbc fails

2006-12-07 Thread Knut Anders Hatlen
Marco Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello everyone, I wrote a function called CHKANI(ani varchar(50)) and it works pretty fine in ij. Now I try to use it with the DB2 ODBC-Driver and it fails with ... is not recognized as a function or procedure. The statement looks like this: SELECT

Re: java method called from a JSP cannot load ClientDriver

2006-12-07 Thread Sisilla
Thank you, Knut, for your reply and your efforts to help me. It turns out that the fields I thought contained null values actually contained empty strings, so the NOT NULL constraints are working fine. ~Sisilla Knut Anders Hatlen wrote: Sisilla [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello Again, It

RE: Best choice for column's data type to represent boolean data

2006-12-07 Thread derby
I have a need for columns of boolean data to indicate if items in my database have (or do not have) certain attributes. These are all truly yes/no values. For Derby what is the best approach for me to take (I have next to zero database experience so I am not aware of any best practices)?

Re: Best choice for column's data type to represent boolean data

2006-12-07 Thread Leslie Software
Thanks for the advice I was leaning towards the numeric solution but using 'T' / 'F' as a visual clue makes a lot of sense. After all until we do have a new boolean data type that visual clue is all we have. I am already looking forward to the next version:-) Ian - Original Message

Re: Best choice for column's data type to represent boolean data

2006-12-07 Thread Bayless Kirtley
Is there reason to think the next version may support Boolean data type? If so then what about Java Objects? Bayless - Original Message - From: Leslie Software [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Derby Discussion derby-user@db.apache.org Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 8:07 AM Subject: Re: Best

Re: Best choice for column's data type to represent boolean data

2006-12-07 Thread Michael Segel
I'm not sure where that came from, however I'm sure its somewhere on the wish list. Since the boolean type has been around for a while, and its implemented in other databases, its not out of the realm of being added. With respect to java objects, what are they? Note: that was a rhetorical

RE: Best choice for column's data type to represent boolean data

2006-12-07 Thread Ian Leslie
Actually I was just opening wishing but I checked the bug database and found issue 499 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-499. Looks like a lot of work was done and it was almost in but had to backed out http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1029 because of a blocking issue

Re: Best choice for column's data type to represent boolean data

2006-12-07 Thread Rick Hillegas
Hi Ian, Two issues block the introduction of a BOOLEAN datatype: 1) We need DRDA support in order to transport this type across our network layer. I am cautiously optimistic that we will see this type appear in the DRDA spec early in 2007. So, soon, this issue will not block us. 2)

Re: calling a function over odbc fails

2006-12-07 Thread Marco Schilling
Knut Anders Hatlen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Marco Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello everyone, I wrote a function called CHKANI(ani varchar(50)) and it works pretty fine in ij. Now I try to use it with the DB2 ODBC-Driver and it fails with ... is not recognized as a

Re: Best choice for column's data type to represent boolean data

2006-12-07 Thread Daniel John Debrunner
Rick Hillegas wrote: Hi Ian, Two issues block the introduction of a BOOLEAN datatype: 1) We need DRDA support in order to transport this type across our network layer. I am cautiously optimistic that we will see this type appear in the DRDA spec early in 2007. So, soon, this issue will not