Re: [libreoffice-design] Banner for AMA and 6.1 release

2018-08-08 Thread Heiko Tietze
Thank you so much. Great work as usual. On 8 August 2018 21:16:06 CEST, K-J LibreOffice wrote: >Am 08.08.2018 um 12:56 schrieb Heiko Tietze: >> The exact link will be announced by Reddit not before the event >starts. So we go best with " at /r/linux". Would be needed this >evening. If that's too

Re: [libreoffice-design] Banner for AMA and 6.1 release

2018-08-08 Thread K-J LibreOffice
Am 08.08.2018 um 12:56 schrieb Heiko Tietze: > The exact link will be announced by Reddit not before the event starts. So we > go best with " at /r/linux". Would be needed this evening. If that's > too short we take what you made so far. Not a big deal the channel as the > banner never goes

Re: [libreoffice-design] Agenda for the design/UX meeting 2018-Aug-08

2018-08-08 Thread Adolfo Jayme Barrientos
[...] > > * Bundle the new "EB Garamond" font with LibreOffice I would really prefer that we didn’t add it if there are no reasons beyond document compatibility with proprietary office applications. Let us remind ourselves that we bundle fonts that are really necessary for language support and

Re: [libreoffice-design] Banner for AMA and 6.1 release

2018-08-08 Thread Heiko Tietze
The exact link will be announced by Reddit not before the event starts. So we go best with " at /r/linux". Would be needed this evening. If that's too short we take what you made so far. Not a big deal the channel as the banner never goes without text. Thanks for your work, Heiko On 6 August

Re: [libreoffice-design] Agenda for the design/UX meeting 2018-Aug-08

2018-08-08 Thread Cor Nouws
Pedro Rosmaninho wrote on 08-08-18 10:55: > Ok, seriously? If you open the deck it's because you want several > styles. What's the problem with offering choice in styles? I don't > want to see any Style being dropped. This obssession some people have > with decreasing user choice... Jeez. ;) I

Re: [libreoffice-design] Agenda for the design/UX meeting 2018-Aug-08

2018-08-08 Thread Pedro Rosmaninho
> * Styles & Formatting deck is overpopulated with styles >+ https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69551 (and > tdf#118664) >+ bad generic statement, disagree with the idea of "too many" styles >+ what is a "good number of styles"?, what should to be dropped > exactly?