Hi Christoph,

How on earth did you find out so soon, it was me? :)

We finished the first round yesterday night. Both David and I have the same 
habit: We brush up the content in several passes, and keep doing it till it is 
perfected. Now that we are in the SEO-optimization phase, this habit is going 
to be very useful! :)

But the point is that the site is ready for the launch. No missing content or 
links. All the required sections fully completed.
The SEO-optimization will continue for the next 2-3 months.

@Duplication: Sometimes the same information is "almost" replicated in 
different pages, because some people search for a specific combination, and the 
combination of page title, meta tags and content has to show up in search 
engines. That's why we have to provide different combination.

Similarly, right now the description looks "to the point". But after we analyze 
the Google page rankings, we may have to repeat the same information in 
equivalent terms (on the same page or multiple pages), so that their ranking 
goes up. This would result in a page that looks a bit odd to the reader. But 
finally we need more people to land on the page through search engines, so such 
deliberate repetition is unavoidable. 

@location of "why" pages:
Logically, the reader should come across "why Libreoffice" right AFTER "what is 
LibreOffice?". 
So we may have to rearrange this. David?

Regards,
Narayan

> Subject: [libreoffice-website] Thanks and Thoughts (was: Re: 
> [libreoffice-design] UX/Visual   Design Description (Draft) [...])
> From: christ...@dogmatux.com
> To: webs...@libreoffice.org
> CC: design@libreoffice.org
> Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 23:42:20 +0100
> 
> Hi Jaron, David,
> 
> thanks a lot to you both! Well appreciated - at the moment it's much fun
> to see the site evolve :-) And, I already used the revised text to
> invite some more people within our community to join the Design Team.
> 
> David, just a side note: I've noticed the new "Why for ..." pages that
> provide great content (thanks to the creator, Narayan?). But here some
> things I've noticed as well: Very similar information is now available
> for "Features" (LibreOffice) and "Home", and the location "Home" might
> be misleading for the "Why..." elements. (Example: If the user opened
> "Get Help" and just sees "Home" as the main menu item, might he think
> that the "Why" elements are located there?) Furthermore, the link to
> "See what LibO can do for you" now seems a bit strange.
> 
> Could you please tell me whether you are still working on that? If not,
> may I provide some more thoughts (structure, punctuation, outline,
> links, ...)?
> 
> Cheers,
> Christoph
> 
> Am Montag, den 24.01.2011, 04:15 +0800 schrieb David Nelson:
> > Hi Jaron, :-)
> > 
> > I already proofread Christoph's draft and put it on the site, but many
> > thanks anyway. ;-)
> > 
> > David Nelson
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+h...@libreoffice.org
> List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/website/
> *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
                                          
-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***

Reply via email to