Le 2011-05-21 18:29, Phil Jackson a écrit :
Hi Bernhard
Good point about some confusion for some shorted tags.
There has to be a balance I think in terms of brevity and identification
while taking into account acronyms that might have dual meanings and
having some consistency.
Might I suggest that we do something like your suggestion for ViDes but
have 3 letters for first word and 2-3 for second word
The following and other tags could be
[VisIde]
[BraDes]
[VisDes]
and
[UsaPro] for Usability productivity
[UsaInt] for Usability Interface
Also, you are right about having a reference page somewhere for Design
Tags - this could be for example on the first Design\WhiteBoards page.
Cheers
Phil Jackson
On 5/22/2011 8:47 AM, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
I was also going to suggest the same thing about 3-4 letter designation.
Most first language EN speaking person could get a better guess of the
meaning behind these designations although "Usa" will be more difficult.
Perhaps "Usab" instead? "Prod" instead of "Pro". This way we can shorten
the learning curve for new users by quite a bit.
I would favour:
[VisDes]
[UsabProd]
[UsabInt]
Cheers
Marc
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
