Sorry for the late response. I've been focusing on work lately.
My apologies, as I didn't realize that the crowdmatch code was already
checking for this. I'm surprised, though, that the decision was made to
hard code the value up front, as I don't think it'd be much more difficult
to add the
On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 07:37:59AM -0500, Jason Harrer wrote:
> Not sure how the dev list got removed, but adding it back in at this point.
>
> It sounds like there was consensus on this overall limit (just not project
> limits). That being said, I'm going to open up a ticket on GitLab so we on
Sorry, one last piece for the design team: Because the discussion was that
we will hard code $5 limit for alpha, I need a revised prototype that
either completely removes the UI for changing the limit OR disables this UI
(with a note for the site users to understand that the feature is
On 07/31/2017 06:16 AM, mray wrote:
>
>
> On 30.07.2017 20:24, Aaron Wolf wrote:
>> ... Because
>> it's user-adjustable, they could make per-project budgets or choose to
>> budget separate amounts for music, art, software, etc. as fits their
>> priorities.
>>
>> The key point is that there's
On 30.07.2017 20:24, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> ... Because
> it's user-adjustable, they could make per-project budgets or choose to
> budget separate amounts for music, art, software, etc. as fits their
> priorities.
>
> The key point is that there's nothing wrong with C.
The way I see this kind of
On 07/30/2017 09:07 AM, Stephen Michel wrote:> Here's what I remember
from the discussions a few months back:
>
> On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 1:32 AM, Jason Harrer
> wrote:
>>
>> There are two major concerns with this part of the prototype:
>>
>> 1) This goes against the