(In reply to Andre Guerreiro from comment #76)
> Created attachment 118745 [details] [review]
> Incremental hashing + large file support
>
> With this patch I've implemented the incremental hashing plus the large file
> support.
>
> This is still untested with files larger than 2GB but is
(In reply to Adrian Johnson from comment #78)
> I agree that the two calls to doGetChars and updateHash should be merged but
> I don't think a for loop is the best way to process loops where the
> increment is not exactly the same on each iteration. Maybe something like
> this:
>
> void
(In reply to Adrian Johnson from comment #78)
> I agree that the two calls to doGetChars and updateHash should be merged but
> I don't think a for loop is the best way to process loops where the
> increment is not exactly the same on each iteration. Maybe something like
> this:
>
> void
(In reply to Andre Guerreiro from comment #76)
> Created attachment 118745 [details] [review]
> Incremental hashing + large file support
>
> With this patch I've implemented the incremental hashing plus the large file
> support.
>
> This is still untested with files larger than 2GB but is
I am not sure if I am just missing where this is verified earlier, but
isn't
unsigned int signed_data_len = r2.getInt()+r4.getInt();
unsigned char *to_check = (unsigned char *)gmalloc(signed_data_len);
//Read the 2 slices of data that are signed
doc->getBaseStream()->setPos(0);
I am not sure if I am just missing where this is verified earlier, but
isn't
unsigned int signed_data_len = r2.getInt()+r4.getInt();
unsigned char *to_check = (unsigned char *)gmalloc(signed_data_len);
//Read the 2 slices of data that are signed
doc->getBaseStream()->setPos(0);
Hello,
I am the current maintainer of qpdfview. Since you updated your
distribution, I suppose you also updated your version of qpdfview? Or do
you use an external PPA like [1]?
In any case, if you are now running something higher than version 0.4,
could you try opening a DjVu or PostScript
I do see this behavior on a regular basis but I also run Opera, so I
start to believe that Opera at least triggers something other programs
don't.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
