[Bug 938751] Re: jpeg images are washed out or colors are skewed

I was wondering about this as well, but I figured that it doesn't seem to be a bug at all. The reason why it looks for some of you "correct" in Gimp is, because you don't have color management for your monitor enabled in the preferences (either set a specific monitor profile there, or tick the

[Bug 942131] Re: Sometimes I have to select logout/shut down twice before it has effect

By now I kinda have the feeling that it's the fault of some program. Because when clicking shutdown, a few programs are closed, while other's stay open. Only after the second shutdown, all close. So one program is apparently not responding to the signal the first time. -- You received this bug

[Bug 942131] Re: Sometimes I have to select logout/shut down twice before it has effect

Happens on Ubuntu GNOME 14.04 now as well since about a week. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/942131 Title: Sometimes I have to select logout/shut down twice

[Bug 1292282] Re: background transparency is not working on gnome terminal

Will it be backported to LTS? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292282 Title: background transparency is not working on gnome terminal To manage

[Bug 1292282] Re: background transparency is not working on gnome terminal

Tobias: That PPA sadly requires GnomeShell 3.12 actually, it won't work with vanilla installation. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292282 Title: background

[Bug 775016] [NEW] Graphical bug in gnome panel context menu

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-panel When right clicking on an applet in the gnome panel, like the shutdown applet for instance, the background in context menu looks screwed up. This didn't happen on Maverick but started on Natty. Screenshot attached. ** Affects: gnome-panel

[Bug 775016] Re: Graphical bug in gnome panel context menu

** Attachment added: Screenshot of context menu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/775016/+attachment/2103731/+files/panel-bug.png ** Description changed: Binary package hint: gnome-panel When right clicking on an applet in the gnome panel, like the shutdown applet for instance, the

[Bug 586121] [NEW] Unable to force workspace for contactlist or chat-window

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: empathy Using empathy 2.30.1 on Ubuntu Lucid, I'm experiencing the following bug (which the code refers to as 'feature'): As I'm using multiple viewports, and empathy and another view applications are set to run at startup, I want those to spawn at

[Bug 569723] Re: Drives with a size greater than 1024 GB are still displayed with GB instead of TB

This bug seems to be fixed in Lucid and can be closed. -- Drives with a size greater than 1024 GB are still displayed with GB instead of TB https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569723 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus

[Bug 569727] Re: Drives mounted via PAM_mount still show up as drives to mount

** Attachment added: gvfs-mount.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45539723/gvfs-mount.log -- Drives mounted via PAM_mount still show up as drives to mount https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569727 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is

[Bug 569727] Re: Drives mounted via PAM_mount still show up as drives to mount

I don't have udisks installed nor do I find the package for it, is it still required? But here is the gvfs-mount log. -- Drives mounted via PAM_mount still show up as drives to mount https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569727 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 569723] Re: Drives with a size greater than 1024 GB are still displayed with GB instead of TB

** Attachment added: screenshot1.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45544699/screenshot1.png -- Drives with a size greater than 1024 GB are still displayed with GB instead of TB https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569723 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 569723] Re: Drives with a size greater than 1024 GB are still displayed with GB instead of TB

This is Karmic, there is still a bug in the Lucid installer which holds me from installing it. -- Drives with a size greater than 1024 GB are still displayed with GB instead of TB https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569723 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 569723] [NEW] Drives with a size greater than 1024 GB are still displayed with GB instead of TB

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus I have a 12 TB hardware RAID array, which shows up in nautilus and the places menu as 12002 GB drive. IMHO the next higher unit (TB) should be used instead when a drive exceeds 1024 GB. ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

[Bug 569727] [NEW] Drives mounted via PAM_mount still show up as drives to mount

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus I have a hardware RAID array (encrypted via DM-Crypt) which is mounted via PAM_mount on login. It is listed under the Places tho and can be mounted again there, which would result in the same partition mounted twice. The mount command gives the