\o/ Great job guys!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to poppler in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740506
Title:
verify digital signatures
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
\o/ Great job guys!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1085526
Title:
ubuntu pdf doc viewer will not let me sign a document
To manage notifications about this bug go
Comment on attachment 121848
Cache result of inner loop in visitDepthFirst
Looks good to me, pushed. Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/33288
Title:
Evince
As far as I remember the fix only worked for some versions of GS.
Anyway, I'll try to find some time too look at this in detail again.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
(In reply to Jason Crain from comment #6)
I suppose if I add an option to findText, I should also add a flag
(POPPLER_FIND_IGNORE_COMBINING?) to PopplerFindFlags, for the glib front
end's poppler_page_find_text_with_options(). It would be nice if someone
could confirm that evince would
(In reply to Pacho Ramos from comment #36)
(In reply to Carlos Garcia Campos from comment #35)
I've reverted the patch in master for now, until we find a proper solution.
Do you know when a new tarball is planned including this and other fixes?
Thanks
No plans, but I can make a new release
Still doesn't work here, it seems to rotate the first page only of a
multipage document.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1242678
Title:
evince cannot render some EPS
I've reverted the patch in master for now, until we find a proper
solution.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1242678
Title:
evince cannot render some EPS files
To
(In reply to comment #27)
(In reply to comment #25)
Created attachment 101589 [details] [review] [review]
Change direction of rotation
The promised patch.
I'm not sure this should be done here or in evince. Libspectre should do
what the PS spec says, if evince wants the opposite,
(In reply to comment #25)
Created attachment 101589 [details] [review]
Change direction of rotation
The promised patch.
I'm not sure this should be done here or in evince. Libspectre should do
what the PS spec says, if evince wants the opposite, evince should do
the conversion. Or am I
we can discuss them here, if this patch has caused regressions we might
revert it if we don't find a new solution for the regressions.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
(In reply to comment #22)
(In reply to comment #20)
(In reply to comment #19)
Thanks Marek! Do you still plan to look at the evince side as well (since
the rotation seems to still be wrong when using it, as mentioned in
previous
comments)
Hi Sebastien,
thank you for
I've been trying this and I'm getting the opposite results, the attached
ps file is rotated without the patch but nothing is rendered when
rotated with the patch.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
(In reply to comment #17)
Created attachment 100723 [details] [review]
Rotate documents correctly
Hi,
I'm sorry for my late response, I was super busy with something else.
No problem!
(In reply to comment #15)
Comment on attachment 99331 [details] [review] [review]
Rotate documents
Comment on attachment 99331
Rotate documents correctly
Review of attachment 99331:
-
This looks good to me, except the confusing NONE/LANDSCAPE thing.
Adrian, does the PostScript part looks good to you?
:::
I'm not a PostScript expert either.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1242678
Title:
evince cannot render some EPS files
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
(In reply to comment #12)
Yes, you can replace setpagedevice with pop. It is not clear to me how your
patch is doing this. Something like /setpagedevice { pop } bind def should
work.
Thanks Adrian. It seems Marek submitted the same patch again instead of
the updated one.
--
You received this
Comment on attachment 96165
Rotate documents correctly
Review of attachment 96165:
-
Thanks for the patch!
::: libspectre/spectre-device.c
@@ +206,5 @@
return SPECTRE_STATUS_RENDER_ERROR;
}
+
While working on bug #71160 I've found another regression introduced by
this fix. In some cases, additional lines are added to the selection.
For example, open the hig document and go to the first page. Start
selecting the second line, but dragging from the margin, and you will
see that the first
The problem with the patch is that in some cases it's clear that it
improves the output, but in some others I have doubts whether the output
is better or worse, I'll attach some examples found while running my
tests.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Created attachment 70366
Test results examples
Let me know if you want me to send the PDFs to you
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/667752
Title:
Non-embedded
(In reply to comment #26)
What's missing in gnutls is a way to parse all the relevant components of the
PKCS#7 object as present in a PDF signature.
It seems that in gnutls they assume those objects can only contain
certificates
and CRLs as you can confirm if you go through the functions
(In reply to comment #30)
(In reply to comment #26)
What's missing in gnutls is a way to parse all the relevant components of
the
PKCS#7 object as present in a PDF signature.
It seems that in gnutls they assume those objects can only contain
certificates
and CRLs as you can
(In reply to comment #49)
Oh, wait, didn't realize the functions it's adding new parameters are private,
ignore my breaks API part.
No problem :-) but please, ask me before committing any change that
might break the public glib API even in master.
--
You received this bug notification because
(In reply to comment #47)
I've commited this patch to master (what will be 0.22) and not to 0.20 since
it
breaks the public glib api
Really? why? I agree with not committing it to the stable branch, but I
don't think the patch breaks the API, or am I missing something?
Breaking the API should
(In reply to comment #42)
Created an attachment (id=31406) [details]
3/5 reading order (bug fixed)
It seems this bug introduced an important performance regression, see
the detailed analysis in poppler mailing list:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/poppler/2010-October/006566.html
--
(In reply to comment #29)
Note i have *not* verified it fixes the problem mentioned in this bug. Carlos
can you do that part?
it's weird, I don't see any difference with and without the patch with
poppler-glib-demo and the minimal example attached to this bug.
--
You received this bug
(In reply to comment #25)
Created attachment 65449 [details] [review]
Allow multiple fonts in a TextWord
This patch modifies TextWord so that each character can be a different font.
Function poppler_page_get_text_attributes is updated to allow for attributes
to
change mid-word.
Thanks
Sure, no hurry, thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/39890
Title:
characters change when selecting text
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Comment on attachment 55629
fix ctm when painting groups
Review of attachment 55629:
-
Patch looks good to me and it doesn't introduce regressions in my tests,
so please, push it to both branches. Thanks!
--
You received this bug
Comment on attachment 55785
Fix-test-for-rotation.patch
Review of attachment 55785:
-
Pushed to git master, thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.
31 matches
Mail list logo
